FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267  
268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   >>   >|  
_Patres Apostolici_ I. p. xlvi, where the passage is given. [69:2] [Our author (ed. 6, p. xxxv sq) falls foul of my criticism of his references. It is contrary to my purpose to reopen the question, but I confidently leave it to those who will examine the passages for themselves to say whether he is justified in his inferences. He however 'gives up' Wotton and Weismann.] [70:1] p. xxxiv (Reprint of 1858). [70:2] _Fortnightly Review_, January, 1875, p. 9. [71:1] He mentions an earlier edition of this Version printed at Constantinople in 1783, but had not seen it; _Corp. Ign._ p. xvi. [72:1] I. p. 264. [72:2] I. p. 265. [73:1] The Roman Epistle indeed has been separated from its companions, and is imbedded in the Martyrology which stands at the end of this collection in the Latin Version, where doubtless it stood also in the Greek, before the MS of this latter was mutilated. Otherwise the Vossian Epistles come together, and are followed by the confessedly spurious Epistles in the Greek and Latin MSS. In the Armenian all the Vossian Epistles are together, and the confessedly spurious Epistles follow. See Zahn _Ignatius von Antiochien_ p. 111. [73:2] I. p. 262. [73:3] p. 164. [73:4] Ign. _Rom._ 5, where the words [Greek: ego ginosko nun archomai mathetes einai] are found in Eusebius as in the Vossian Epistles, but are wanting in the Curetonian. There are other smaller differences. [74:1] _S.R._ I. p. 269. [74:2] _S.R._ I. p. 267. [75:1] This objection is well discussed by Zahn _Ignatius von Antiochien_ p. 278 sq (1873), where our author's arguments are answered by anticipation substantially as I have answered them in the text. I venture to call attention to this work (which does not appear yet to have attracted the notice of English writers) as the most important contribution to the Ignatian literature which has appeared since Cureton's publications introduced a new era in the controversy. Zahn defends the genuineness of the Vossian Epistles. [76:1] Ruinart _Acta Martyrum Sincera_ p. 134 sq. (Ratisbon, 1859.) [76:2] Ruinart p. 141. 'Praepositus carceris, qui nos magni facere coepit ... multos fratres ad nos admittebat, ut et nos et illi invicem refrigeraremus,' p. 144. 'Tribunus ... jussit illos humanius haberi, ut fratribus ejus et ceteris facultas fieret introeundi et refrigerandi cum eis.' [76:3] _De Morte Peregr._ 12. [77:1] See Zahn _Ignatius_ p. 527. Lucian says of Peregrinus (no
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267  
268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Epistles

 

Vossian

 

Ignatius

 

Version

 

Ruinart

 

answered

 

Antiochien

 

confessedly

 

spurious

 

author


smaller

 

differences

 

Curetonian

 
important
 

wanting

 

writers

 
English
 
attracted
 

notice

 

attention


arguments

 

objection

 
discussed
 

contribution

 

anticipation

 

venture

 

substantially

 

defends

 

fratribus

 

haberi


ceteris

 

fieret

 

facultas

 

humanius

 

refrigeraremus

 

invicem

 

Tribunus

 

jussit

 

introeundi

 

refrigerandi


Lucian

 

Peregrinus

 

Peregr

 
admittebat
 

controversy

 

genuineness

 

Martyrum

 

introduced

 
appeared
 
literature