FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61  
62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   >>   >|  
e. On the view I have taken, there would be little difficulty in the fact that Hortensius now advocates a dogmatic philosophy, though in the lost dialogue which bore his name he had argued against philosophy altogether[258], and denied that philosophy and wisdom were at all the same thing[259]. Such a historical resume as I have supposed Hortensius to give would be within the reach of any cultivated man of the time, and would only be put forward to show that the New Academic revolt against the supposed old Academico-Peripatetic school was unjustifiable. There is actual warrant for stating that his exposition of Antiochus was merely superficial[260]. We are thus relieved from the necessity of forcing the meaning of the word _commoveris_[261], from which Krische infers that the dialogue, entitled _Hortensius_, had ended in a conversion to philosophy of the orator from whom it was named. To any such conversion we have nowhere else any allusion. The relation in which Hortensius stood to Cicero, also his character and attainments, are too well known to need mention here. He seems to have been as nearly innocent of any acquaintance with philosophy as it was possible for an educated man to be. Cicero's materials for the speech of Hortensius were, doubtless, drawn from the published works and oral teaching of Antiochus. The speech of Hortensius was answered by Cicero himself. If my view of the preceding speech is correct, it follows that Cicero in his reply pursued the same course which he takes in his answer to Varro, part of which is preserved in the _Academica Posteriora_[262]. He justified the New Academy by showing that it was in essential harmony with the Old, and also with those ancient philosophers who preceded Plato. Lucullus, therefore, reproves him as a rebel in philosophy, who appeals to great and ancient names like a seditious tribune[263]. Unfair use had been made, according to Lucullus, of Empedocles, Anaxagoras, Democritus, Parmenides, Xenophanes, Plato, and Socrates[264]. But Cicero did not merely give a historical summary. He must have dealt with the theory of [Greek: kataleptike phantasia] and [Greek: ennoiai] (which though really Stoic had been adopted by Antiochus), since he found it necessary to "manufacture" (_fabricari_) Latin terms to represent the Greek[265]. He probably also commented on the headlong rashness with which the dogmatists gave their assent to the truth of phenomena. To this a retort is
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61  
62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

philosophy

 

Hortensius

 

Cicero

 
Antiochus
 

speech

 

historical

 

supposed

 
ancient
 

dialogue

 

Lucullus


conversion

 

philosophers

 
reproves
 

appeals

 

preceded

 
Posteriora
 

pursued

 

correct

 

preceding

 

answered


answer
 

Academy

 
showing
 

essential

 

harmony

 

justified

 

preserved

 

Academica

 
Socrates
 

represent


fabricari
 

manufacture

 

adopted

 

commented

 
phenomena
 

retort

 

assent

 

headlong

 
rashness
 

dogmatists


Anaxagoras

 

Empedocles

 

Democritus

 

Parmenides

 
Xenophanes
 

tribune

 

Unfair

 

teaching

 
theory
 

kataleptike