FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145  
146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   >>   >|  
that the chief danger will be that our necessarily cautious attitude as regards revealing our war aims may give rise to the idea that we are merely trifling with a plan for peace for tactical reasons and do not really earnestly desire peace. We must therefore furnish our representatives accredited to neutrals (the most important being Spain and Holland) with the necessary instructions, so that they may be able to account for our cautious attitude and explain the reasons that keep us from making a premature or one-sided announcement of our conditions. An announcement of the conditions on both sides would expose the belligerent parties in both camps to unfavourable criticism and might easily make the situation more strained; _a one-sided announcement of the war aims would simply afford the leader of the belligerent enemy group the opportunity of undoing everything_. It is therefore in the interests of peace that a communication of the peace terms should only be made mutually and confidentially, but we might be able to give the individual neutral various hints concerning it, to show that our war aims coincide with the lasting interests of humanity and the peace of the world, that our chief aim, _the prevention of Russian world dominion on land and of the English at sea_, is in the interests of the entire world, and that our peace terms would not include anything that would endanger the future peace of the world or could be objected to on the neutral side. I offer these views for your consideration, and remain in truest friendship, your devoted TISZA. My predecessor, Burian, shortly before he left, had drawn up a peace proposal together with Bethmann. The Entente's scornful refusal is still fresh in everyone's memory. Since hostilities have ceased and there have been opportunities of talking to members of the Entente, I have often heard the reproach made that the offer of peace could not have been accepted by the Entente, as it was couched in the terms of a conqueror who "grants" peace terms to the enemy. Although I will not attempt to deny that the tone of the peace proposal was very arrogant--an impression which must have been enhanced by Tisza's speeches in the Hungarian Parliament--I think, nevertheless, that even had it been differently worded it had small prospect of success. However that may be, the stern refusal on the part of the Entente only str
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145  
146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Entente

 

announcement

 

interests

 

conditions

 

neutral

 

proposal

 

refusal

 

belligerent

 

attitude

 

reasons


cautious

 

objected

 

However

 

success

 

worded

 

Bethmann

 

prospect

 

devoted

 
friendship
 

truest


consideration

 
remain
 

shortly

 

differently

 

Burian

 

predecessor

 

scornful

 

reproach

 

arrogant

 
future

impression
 

accepted

 

grants

 

Although

 
conqueror
 
couched
 
enhanced
 

members

 
memory
 

hostilities


attempt

 

ceased

 

opportunities

 

talking

 

speeches

 

Hungarian

 

Parliament

 

instructions

 

Holland

 

important