FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   600   601   602   603   604   605   606   607   608   609   610   611   612   613   614   615   616   617  
618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   >>   >|  
rsonnel and Administration Division, as recorder without vote.] The conclusions and recommendations of the Chamberlin Board represent perhaps the most careful and certainly the last apologia for a segregated Army.[17-3] The Army's postwar racial policy and related directives, the board assured Secretary Gray, were sound, were proving effective, and should be continued in force. It saw only one objection to segregated units: black units had an unduly high proportion of men with low classification test scores, a situation, it believed, that could be altered by raising the entrance level and improving training and leadership. At any rate, the board declared, this disadvantage was a minor one compared to the advantages of an organization that did not force Negroes into competition they were unprepared to face, did not provoke the resentment of white soldiers with the consequent risk of lowered combat effectiveness, and avoided placing black officers and noncommissioned officers in command of white troops, "a position which only the exceptional Negro could successfully fill." [Footnote 17-3: Memo, Gen Chamberlin et al. for SA, 9 Feb 50, sub: Report of Board of Officers on Utilization of Negro Manpower in the Army, AG 291.2 (6 Dec 49). A copy of the report and many of the related and supporting documents are in CMH.] A decision on these matters, the board stated, had to be based on combat effectiveness, not the use of black manpower, and what constituted maximum effectiveness was best left to the judgment of war-tested combat leaders. These men, "almost without exception," vigorously opposed integration. Ignoring the Army's continuing (p. 430) negotiations with the Fahy Committee on the matter, the board called for retaining the 10 percent quota. To remove the quota without imposing a higher entrance standard, it argued, would result in an influx of Negroes "with a corresponding deterioration of combat efficiency." In short, ignoring the political and budgetary realities of the day, the board called on Secretary Gray to repudiate the findings of the Fahy Committee and the stipulations of Executive Order 9981 and to maintain a rigidly segregated service with a carefully regulated percentage of black members. While Gray and Collins let the recommendations of the Chamberlin Board go unanswered, they did v
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   600   601   602   603   604   605   606   607   608   609   610   611   612   613   614   615   616   617  
618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

combat

 

segregated

 

Chamberlin

 

effectiveness

 

Committee

 

called

 

entrance

 

Negroes

 

officers

 
related

recommendations

 
Secretary
 
exception
 

leaders

 
tested
 

judgment

 

vigorously

 

opposed

 
negotiations
 

Division


integration

 

Ignoring

 

continuing

 
maximum
 
decision
 

matters

 

report

 

supporting

 

documents

 

stated


constituted

 
matter
 

recorder

 

manpower

 

percent

 

maintain

 

rigidly

 

Executive

 
stipulations
 

repudiate


findings
 
service
 

carefully

 

unanswered

 

Collins

 

regulated

 

percentage

 
members
 

realities

 
budgetary