FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646  
647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   >>   >|  
950, the figure rose to 139 in March 1952. Most of these units were not in divisions but in service organizations; 113 were service units, of which fifty-three were transportation units. Again as in the Far East, some integration in Europe occurred in response to the influx of new soldiers as well as to Army directives. Handy integrated his Noncommissioned Officers' Academy in 1950 in an operation involving thousands of enlisted men. After he closed the segregated Kitzingen Training Center in February 1951, black troops were absorbed into other training and replacement centers on an integrated basis. For some time Army commanders in Europe had also been assigning certain black soldiers with specialist training to white units, a practice dramatically accelerated in 1950 when the command began receiving many Negroes with occupation specialties unneeded in black units. In March 1951 Handy directed that, while the assignment of Negroes to black units remained the first priority, Negroes possessing qualifications unusable or in excess of the needs of black units would be assigned where they could be used most effectively.[17-75] Consequently, by the end of 1951 some 7 percent of all black enlisted men, 17 percent of the black officers, and all black soldiers of the Women's Army Corps in the command were serving in integrated units. [Footnote 17-75: Ltr, EUCOM to Sub Cmds, 16 Mar 51, sub: Utilization of Negro Personnel, USAREUR SGS 291.2. See also EUCOM Hist Div, "Integration of Negro and White Troops in the U.S. Army, Europe, 1952-1954," p. 4, in CMH. This monograph, prepared by Ronald Sher, will be cited hereafter as Sher Monograph.] In sharp contrast to the Far East Command, there was little support among senior Army officials in Europe for full integration. Sent by Assistant Secretary Johnson to brief European commanders on the Army's decision, Eli Ginzberg met with almost universal skepticism. Most commanders were unaware of the Army's success with integration in the Far East and in the training divisions at home; when so informed they were quick to declare such a move impractical for Europe. They warned of the social problems that would arise with the all-white civilian population and predicted that the Army would be forced to abandon (p. 451) the program in midstream.[17-76]
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646  
647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Europe

 

integration

 
training
 

commanders

 

Negroes

 

soldiers

 

integrated

 
divisions
 

enlisted

 

percent


service

 

command

 

monograph

 

Ronald

 

prepared

 
Monograph
 

USAREUR

 
Utilization
 

Personnel

 

Troops


Integration

 

impractical

 

warned

 
declare
 

informed

 

social

 
problems
 

program

 
midstream
 

abandon


forced
 
civilian
 
population
 
predicted
 

success

 

unaware

 

senior

 

officials

 

support

 

contrast


Command

 
Assistant
 

Secretary

 

universal

 

skepticism

 

Ginzberg

 

Johnson

 
European
 
decision
 

excess