FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654  
655   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   >>   >|  
r was there evidence of any appreciable resentment toward integration on the part of white civilian employees, even when they worked with or under black officers and enlisted men. [Footnote 17-99: One exception was the strong objection in some states to racially mixed marriages contracted by soldiers. Twenty-seven states had some form of miscegenation law. The Army therefore did not assign to stations in those states soldiers who by reason of their mixed marriages might be subject to criminal penalties. See Memo, Chief, Classification and Standards Branch, DCSPER, for Planning Office, 28 Feb 50, sub: Assignment of Personnel; DF, DCSPER to TAG, 4 Jun 54; both in DCSPER 291.2. For further discussion of the matter, see TAGO, Policy Paper, July 1954; New York _Post_, November 13, 1957.] [Footnote 17-100: HUMRRO, Integration of Social Activities on Nine Army Posts, Aug 53. See also Interv, Nichols with Davis. A DCSPER action officer, Davis was intimately involved with the Army's integration program during this period.] [Footnote 17-101: Interv, author with Evans, 4 Dec 73, CMH files.] The on-post dance, a valuable morale builder, was usually restricted to one race because commanders were afraid of arousing antagonism in nearby communities. But even here restrictions were not uniform. Mutual use of dance floors by white and black couples was frequent though not commonplace and was accepted in officers' clubs, many noncommissioned officers' clubs, and at special unit affairs. The rules for social integration were flexible, and many adjustments could be made to the sentiments of the community if the commander had the will and the tact. Some commanders, unaware of what was being accomplished by progressive colleagues, were afraid to establish a precedent, and often avoided practices that were common elsewhere. Social scientists reviewing the situation suggested that the Army should acquaint the commanders with the existing wide range of social possibilities. Fear of congressional disapproval, another reason often given for deferring integration,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654  
655   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

integration

 

DCSPER

 

officers

 

Footnote

 

states

 

commanders

 

social

 

reason

 

afraid

 
soldiers

marriages

 
Interv
 
Social
 

floors

 
restrictions
 

uniform

 

Mutual

 

couples

 
commonplace
 

accepted


period

 

frequent

 

author

 
antagonism
 
program
 

restricted

 

morale

 

valuable

 

builder

 

nearby


communities

 
arousing
 

community

 

reviewing

 

situation

 

suggested

 

scientists

 

precedent

 
avoided
 

practices


common
 
acquaint
 

existing

 

disapproval

 

deferring

 

congressional

 

possibilities

 
establish
 

colleagues

 
adjustments