FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   661   662  
663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   >>   >|  
portion at least of the British nation against the government and people of the United States--a war tolerated although not declared or avowed by the British Government. If through the necessary employment of all our means of national defense such a partial war shall become a general one between the two nations, the President thinks that the responsibility for that painful result will not fall upon the United States." ENGLAND'S MALIGNANT NEUTRALITY. The truth is that the so-called neutral policy of foreign Powers was the vicious application of obsolete analogies to the conditions of modern life. Because of the doctrine of belligerent recognition had in its origin referred to nations of well established, independent existence, the doctrine was now pushed forward to the extent of giving ocean belligerency to an insurgent which had in reality no maritime power whatever. It was an old and recognized principle that the commercial relations of the neutral should not be interfered with unless they worked positive injury to the belligerent. The new application made the interests of neutral commerce the supreme factor in determining how far belligerent rights should be respected. The ship-building and carrying-trade of England were to be maintained and encouraged at any cost to the belligerent. Under the old law, a belligerent had the right to purchase a ship and a cargo, or a neutral might run a blockade, taking all the risk of capture. By the new construction, power was to be given to a belligerent to transfer the entire administration of its naval service to foreign soil, and to create and equip a navy which issued from foreign waters, ready not for a dangerous journey to their own ports of delivery, but for the immediate demonstration of hostile purpose. No such absurd system can be found in the principles or precedents of international law; no such system would be permitted by the great powers of Europe if to-morrow they should engage in war. The principle of this policy was essentially mercenary. It professed no moral sense. It might be perfectly indifferent to the high or the low issues which the contest between the belligerents involved; it was deaf to any thing which might be urged by justice of humanity or friendship; it was the cynical recognition of the truth of the old proverb that "It is an ill wind which blows good to no one." It was the same principle up
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   661   662  
663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

belligerent

 

neutral

 

principle

 

foreign

 

application

 

policy

 

doctrine

 

system

 

British

 
recognition

States

 
nations
 
United
 

dangerous

 
waters
 

issued

 

purpose

 

journey

 
delivery
 

hostile


demonstration

 

create

 

government

 
blockade
 
purchase
 

people

 

taking

 

entire

 

administration

 

absurd


service

 
transfer
 

capture

 

construction

 

principles

 

nation

 

involved

 

belligerents

 
issues
 

contest


justice
 
humanity
 

friendship

 

cynical

 

proverb

 

indifferent

 

permitted

 
powers
 

Europe

 
international