FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   843   844   845   846   847   848   849   850   851   852   853   854   855   856   857   858   859   860   861   862   863   864   865   866   867  
868   869   870   871   872   873   874   875   876   877   878   879   880   881   882   883   884   885   886   887   888   889   890   891   892   >>   >|  
rning combat veterans, might have explained the singular lack of adverse congressional reaction to the order. No less a personage than Chairman L. Mendel Rivers of the House Armed Services Committee admitted that he had no objection to the sanctions near Andrews. Asked about possible sanctions elsewhere, Rivers added that he would cross that bridge later.[23-91] [Footnote 23-91: New York _Times_, June 23, 1967. Rivers did criticize later applications of the housing sanctions; see Washington _Post_, December 28, 1977.] Rivers and his congressional allies would have little time for reflection, because McNamara quickly made it clear that the Andrews action was only a first step. Sanctions were imposed in rapid succession on areas surrounding four other military installations in Maryland, Fort George G. Meade, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Edgewood Arsenal, and Fort Holabird.[23-92] More pressure was placed on segregationists when McNamara announced on 8 September his intention to extend the sanctions nationwide. He singled out California, where the Defense Department census had shown black servicemen barred from a third of all rental units, for special attention. In fact, off-limits sanctions imposed on broad geographical areas were used only once more--in December 1967 against multiple rental properties in the northern Virginia area.[23-93] In the meantime, the Department of Defense had developed a less dramatic but equally effective method of exerting economic pressure on landlords. On 17 July 1967 McNamara ordered the establishment of housing referral offices at all installations where more than 500 men were assigned. All married servicemen seeking off-base housing were required to obtain prior clearance from these offices before entering into rental agreements with landlords.[23-94] [Footnote 23-92: Actually, McNamara imposed the sanctions in the first two instances, the Secretary of the Army in the other two.] [Footnote 23-93: DOD News Release No. 1209-67, 26 Dec 67.] [Footnote 23-94: Memo, SecDef for Service Secys et al., 17 Jul 67, sub: Off-Base Housing Referral Services, SD files.] Finally, in the wake of the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 and the Supreme Court's ruling ag
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   843   844   845   846   847   848   849   850   851   852   853   854   855   856   857   858   859   860   861   862   863   864   865   866   867  
868   869   870   871   872   873   874   875   876   877   878   879   880   881   882   883   884   885   886   887   888   889   890   891   892   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
sanctions
 

Rivers

 

McNamara

 

Footnote

 
housing
 

rental

 
imposed
 

pressure

 
landlords
 
offices

December

 

installations

 

Services

 

servicemen

 

Defense

 
Department
 
congressional
 

Andrews

 

limits

 
referral

establishment

 

geographical

 

meantime

 

Virginia

 

developed

 

effective

 

assigned

 

equally

 
method
 
northern

dramatic

 
multiple
 

properties

 

exerting

 

economic

 

ordered

 

Housing

 
Referral
 

Finally

 
ruling

Supreme

 

passage

 

Rights

 
Service
 
SecDef
 

clearance

 

entering

 

agreements

 

obtain

 

married