FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   858   859   860   861   862   863   864   865   866   867   868   869   870   871   872   873   874   875   876   877   878   879   880   881   882  
883   884   885   886   887   888   889   890   891   892   893   894   895   896   897   898   899   900   901   902   903   904   >>  
d reached the wrong conclusion from their data. They were correct when they charged that, despite competent and even heroic performance on the part of some individuals and units, the large black combat units had, on average, performed poorly during the war. But the traditionalists failed, as they had failed after World War I, to see the reasons for this poor performance. Not the least of these were the benumbing discrimination suffered by black servicemen during training, the humiliations involved in their assignments, and the ineptitude of many of their leaders, who were most often white. Above all, the postwar manpower planners drew the wrong conclusion from the fact that the average General Classification Test scores of men in World War II black units fell significantly below that of their white counterparts. The scores were directly related to the two groups' relative educational advantages which depended to a large extent on their economic status and the geographic region from which they came. This mental average of servicemen was a unit problem, for at all times the total number of white individuals who scored in low-aptitude categories IV and V greatly outnumbered black individuals in those categories. This greater number of less gifted white (p. 618) servicemen had been spread thinly throughout the services' thousands of white units where they caused no particular problem. The lesser number of Negroes with low aptitude, however, were concentrated in the relatively few black units, creating a serious handicap to efficient performance. Conversely, the contribution of talented black servicemen was largely negated by their frequent assignment to units with too many low-scoring men. Small units composed in the main of black specialists, such as the black artillery and armor units that served in the European theater during World War II, served with distinction, but these units were special cases where the effect of segregation was tempered by the special qualifications of the carefully chosen men. Segregation and not mental aptitude was the key to the poor performance of the large black units in World War II. [Illustration: AMERICAN SAILORS _help evacuate Vietnamese child_.] Postwar service policies ignored these facts and defended segregation in the name of military efficiency. In short, the armed forces had to make inefficiency seem efficient as they explained in paternalistic fashion that segregation was
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   858   859   860   861   862   863   864   865   866   867   868   869   870   871   872   873   874   875   876   877   878   879   880   881   882  
883   884   885   886   887   888   889   890   891   892   893   894   895   896   897   898   899   900   901   902   903   904   >>  



Top keywords:
performance
 

servicemen

 

average

 

segregation

 
individuals
 

number

 
aptitude
 

categories

 
problem
 
mental

efficient

 

scores

 

served

 

special

 

failed

 
conclusion
 
creating
 

efficiency

 

handicap

 
paternalistic

largely

 

negated

 

frequent

 

talented

 

contribution

 

concentrated

 

Conversely

 

military

 
thousands
 
caused

services

 
spread
 

thinly

 

explained

 

Negroes

 

forces

 

assignment

 
lesser
 

inefficiency

 
fashion

evacuate

 

tempered

 

Vietnamese

 
effect
 
Postwar
 

qualifications

 

carefully

 

SAILORS

 

Illustration

 

Segregation