FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   540   541   542   543   544   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564  
565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   >>   >|  
med services. In its special preelection session, the Eightieth Congress ignored the recently issued Truman order on racial equality just as it ignored the President's admonition to enact a general civil rights program. But when the new Eighty-first Congress met in January 1949 the subjects of armed forces integration, the Truman order, and the Fahy Committee all began to receive attention. Debate on race in the services occurred frequently in both houses. Each side appealed to constitutional and legal principles to support its case, but the discussions might well have remained a philosophical debate if the draft law had not come up for renewal in 1950. The debate focused mostly on an amendment proposed by Senator Richard B. Russell of Georgia that would allow inductees and enlistees, upon their written declaration of intent, to serve in a unit manned exclusively by members of their own race. Russell had made this proposal once before, but because it seemed of little consequence to the still largely segregated services of 1948 it was ignored. Now in the wake of the executive order and the Fahy Committee Report, the amendment came to sudden prominence. And when Russell succeeded in discharging the draft bill with his amendment from the Senate Armed Forces Committee with the members' unanimous approval, civil rights supporters quickly (p. 390) jumped to the attack. Even before the bill was formally introduced on the floor, Senator Wayne Morse of Oregon told his colleagues that the Russell amendment conflicted with the stated policy of the administration as well as with sound Republican principles. He cited the waste of manpower the amendment would bring about and reminded his colleagues of the international criticism the armed forces had endured in the past because of undemocratic social practices.[15-42] [Footnote 15-42: _Congressional Record_, 81st Cong., 2d sess., vol. 96, p. 8412.] When debate began on the amendment, Senator Leverett Saltonstall of Massachusetts was one of the first to rise in opposition. While confessing sympathy for the states' rights philosophy that recognized the different customs of various sections of the nation, he branded the Russell amendment unnecessary, provocative, and unworkable, and suggested Congress leave the services alone in this matter. To support his views he read into the record portions of the Fahy Committee Report, which represented, he
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   540   541   542   543   544   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564  
565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

amendment

 

Russell

 

Committee

 

services

 

Senator

 

rights

 

debate

 

Congress

 

principles

 
support

colleagues

 
members
 
Report
 

Truman

 
forces
 

conflicted

 

represented

 

Oregon

 
stated
 

policy


Republican

 

administration

 

matter

 
approval
 
supporters
 

portions

 

quickly

 

unanimous

 

Senate

 

Forces


record

 
suggested
 

introduced

 

formally

 

jumped

 

attack

 

provocative

 

recognized

 
customs
 

Leverett


opposition
 
confessing
 

sympathy

 

philosophy

 

Saltonstall

 

Massachusetts

 

Record

 
reminded
 

international

 
criticism