FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   580  
581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   600   601   602   603   604   605   >>   >|  
Marr to author, 19 Jun 70.] [Footnote 16-15: MATS Hq Ltr No. 9, 1 May 49, SecAF files.] The order itself, as approved by the Secretary of Defense on 11 May 1949 and published on the same day as Air Force Letter 35-3, was unmistakable in intent and clearly spelled out a new bill of rights for Negroes in the Air Force.[16-16] The published directive differed in some respects from the version drafted by the Chief of Staff in January. Despite General Edwards's comments at the commanders' conference in April, the provision for allowing commanders to segregate barracks "if considered necessary" was removed even before the plan was first forwarded to the Secretary of Defense. This deletion was made in the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force, probably by Zuckert.[16-17] Later Zuckert commented, "I wouldn't want to give the commanders that kind of sweeping power. I would be afraid of how it might be exercised."[16-18] From the beginning, black airmen were billeted routinely in the living quarters of the units to which they were assigned. [Footnote 16-16: AF Ltr 35-3, 11 May 49. Effective until 11 May 1950, the order was superseded by a new but similar letter, AF Ltr 35-78, on 14 September 1950.] [Footnote 16-17: Memo, ASecAF for Symington, 12 Jan 49, AF Negro Affairs 49, SecAF files.] [Footnote 16-18: USAF Oral Hist Interv with Zuckert.] The final version of the directive also deleted reference to a 10 percent limitation on black strength in formerly white units. Zuckert had assured the Fahy Committee this limitation was designed to facilitate, not frustrate, the absorption of Negroes into white units, and Edwards even agreed that given the determination of Air Force officials to make a success of their program, the measure was probably unnecessary.[16-19] In the end Zuckert decided to drop any reference to such limitations "because of the confusion that seemed to arise from this statement."[16-20] [Footnote 16-19: Testimony of Zuckert and Edwards, USAF, Before the Fahy Committee, 28 Mar 49, afternoon session, pp. 7-8.] [Footnote 16-20: Memo, ASecAF for Symington, 29 Apr 49, sub: Department of the Air Force Implementation of t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   580  
581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   600   601   602   603   604   605   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Footnote
 

Zuckert

 

Secretary

 

Edwards

 
commanders
 

directive

 
Negroes
 

Committee

 
limitation
 
reference

version

 

Defense

 

published

 

Symington

 

ASecAF

 
percent
 
strength
 

letter

 

superseded

 
Affairs

similar

 

September

 

Interv

 

deleted

 

measure

 

statement

 

Testimony

 

Before

 
limitations
 
confusion

afternoon

 
Department
 

Implementation

 

session

 

agreed

 

determination

 

absorption

 
frustrate
 

designed

 
facilitate

officials

 

decided

 

unnecessary

 
success
 
program
 

assured

 

respects

 

drafted

 

differed

 

rights