FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569  
570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   >>   >|  
to CSA, 6 Apr 51, sub: Summary of Advances in Utilization of Negro Manpower, CS 291.2 Negroes.] Rosenberg and her departmental colleagues were less forthcoming in some other areas of civil rights. Reflecting a desire to placate segregationist forces in Congress, they did little, for example, to promote federal protection of servicemen in cases of racial violence outside the military reservation. The NAACP had been urging the passage of such legislation for many years, and in March 1951 Clarence Mitchell called Rosenberg's attention to the mistreatment of black servicemen and their families suffered at the hands of policemen and civilians in communities surrounding some military bases.[15-56] At times, Walter White charged, these humiliations and abuses by civilians were condoned by military police. He warned that such treatment "can only succeed in adversely affecting the morale of Negro troops ... and hamper efforts to secure fullhearted support of the American Negro for the Government's military and foreign policy program."[15-57] [Footnote 15-56: Ltr, Mitchell to Rosenberg, 26 Mar 51, SD 291.2.] [Footnote 15-57: Telgs, White to Marshall and SA, 9 Jan 51, copy in SD 291.2.] The civil rights leaders had at least some congressional support for their demand. Congressman Abraham J. Multer of New York called on the Armed Services Committee to include in the 1950 extension of the Selective Service Act an amendment making attacks on uniformed men and women and discrimination against them by public officials and in public places of recreation and interstate travel federal offenses.[15-58] Focusing on a different aspect of the problem, Senator Humphrey introduced an amendment to the Senate version of the bill to protect servicemen detained by public authority against civil violence or punishment by extra legal forces. Both amendments were tabled before final vote on the bill.[15-59] [Footnote 15-58: _Congressional Record_, 81st Cong., 2d sess., vol. 96, p. A888.] [Footnote 15-59: Ibid., p. 904. For the Army's opposition to these proposals, see Memo ACofS, G-1, for CofS, 12 Apr 50, sub: Department of the Army Policies re Segregation and Utilization of Negro Manpower, G-1
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569  
570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Footnote

 
military
 
servicemen
 

public

 

Rosenberg

 

federal

 

support

 

called

 
Mitchell
 

amendment


violence

 

rights

 

civilians

 

Manpower

 

Utilization

 

forces

 

travel

 

officials

 

interstate

 

places


offenses
 

recreation

 
Focusing
 

Selective

 

Services

 

Committee

 

Multer

 

demand

 

Congressman

 

Abraham


include

 

attacks

 

uniformed

 
making
 

extension

 

Service

 

discrimination

 
opposition
 

proposals

 

Department


Policies

 

Segregation

 

Record

 

version

 

protect

 

detained

 

authority

 

Senate

 

introduced

 

problem