FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46  
47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   >>   >|  
n the nature of the pronunciation, on the longer or shorter duration of the vowel itself, and not on the grammatical accent. This latter may lie just as well on syllables prosodically short, as on those which are long." From these introductory remarks, we turn again to the historical part of our essay, referring the reader back to our division of the whole Slavic race into Eastern and Western Stems. We have, first of all, that most remarkable Old or Church Slavonic, the language of their Bible, now no longer a living tongue, but still the inexhaustible source of the sublimest and holiest expressions for its younger sisters. Then follow the _four_ languages, perfectly distinct from each other, spoken by the Eastern Slavic nations, viz. the Russian, Illyrico-Servian, Vindish, and Bulgarian. Three of them possess a literature of their own; and one of them, the Illyrico-Servian, even a double literature; for political circumstances and the influence of the early division of the oriental and occidental churches, having unfortunately split the nation into two parts, caused them also to adopt two different methods of writing one and the same language, as we shall show in the sequel. And lastly, among the Slavic nations of the Western stem, we find either _three_ or _four_ different languages, according as we regard the Czekhish and Slovakian idioms as essentially the same or distinct, viz. the Bohemian, [Slovakian,] Polish, and Sorabic in Lusatia. Of these, the first and third have each an extensive literature of its own.[25] FOOTNOTES: [Footnote 1: See Schlegel's _Sprache und Weisheit der Indier_, Heidelb. 1808. Von Hammer's _Fundgruben des Orients_, Vol. II. p. 459 sq. Murray's _History of the European Languages_, Edinb. 1823. F.G. Eichhoff, _Histoire de la Langue et de la Literature des Slaves etc. considerees dans leur origins Indienne, etc._ Paris, 1839.--Frenzel, who wrote at the close of the seventeenth century, took the Slavi for a Hebrew tribe and their language for Hebrew. Some modern German and Italian historians derive the Slavic language from the Thracian, and the Slavi immediately from Japhet; some consider the ancient Scythians as Slavi. See Dobrovsky's _Slovanka_, VII. p. 94,] [Footnote 2: _Krivitshi_. The Greek is _Krobuzoi_, Herodot 4. 49. Comp. Strabo VII. p. 318, 319. Plin. H.N. IV. 12.] [Footnote 3: The first writers, who mention the Slavi expressly, are Jordan or Jornandes, after A.D. 552; P
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46  
47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Slavic

 

language

 

Footnote

 

literature

 

Western

 

Eastern

 
distinct
 

nations

 
languages
 
Hebrew

Slovakian

 
Servian
 
Illyrico
 

longer

 
division
 

Slaves

 
duration
 

Literature

 
Eichhoff
 

Histoire


Langue

 
shorter
 

Frenzel

 

origins

 

Indienne

 

considerees

 

Heidelb

 

Indier

 

Hammer

 

Weisheit


Schlegel

 

accent

 

Sprache

 
Fundgruben
 
grammatical
 

History

 

Murray

 

European

 

Languages

 

seventeenth


Orients

 

pronunciation

 
Strabo
 

Krobuzoi

 
Herodot
 
Jornandes
 

Jordan

 
writers
 
mention
 

expressly