is view has been defended principally
by Russian philologists, the Metropolitan Eugene, Kalajdovitch, etc.]
[Footnote 3: See his _Kyrill und Method_, Prague, 1823. Schloezer
considers likewise the Old Slavic as a Bulgarian dialect of the ninth
century. See his Northern History, p. 330. In another place he calls
it the mother of the other Slavic languages; see his Nestor, I. p.
46.]
[Footnote 4: In his Grammar of the Slavic Language in Carniola,
Carinthia, and Stiria.]
[Footnote 5: _Jahrbuecher der Literatur_, Vienna, 1822, Vol. XVII.
Grimm is of the same opinion; see the Preface to his translation of
Vuk Stephanovitch's Servian Grammar.]
[Footnote 6: See above, p. 11.]
[Footnote 7: This view Schaffarik takes in his work on _Slavic
Antiquities_, and in his _Slavic Ethnography_. Palacky, a
distinguished Bohemian scholar, adopted the same opinion in his
_History of Bohemia_, Prague 1836. Both were combatted in a furious
review by Kopitar, in Chmel's _Oestr. Geschichtsforscher_, III. 1838;
printed separately under the title: _Der Pannonische Ursprung der
Slavischen Liturgie_. etc.]
[Footnote 8: Dobrovsky's _Entwurf zu einer allgemeinen Slavischen
Etymologie_, Prague 1812. See also the _Slovanka_ of this celebrated
scholar.]
[Footnote 9: Schloezer's Nestor, III. p. 224.]
[Footnote 10: Rakoviecky, in his edition of the _Pravda Russka_,
Warsaw 1820-22. Katancsich, _Specimen Philologiae et Geographiae_, etc.
1795. See also Fraehn's publication, "Ueber die alteste Schrift der
Russen," St. Petersb. 1835; where a specimen is given of the form of
writing which the Arabian author Ibn Abi Jakub el Nedim ascribes to
the Russians. This writer lived at the close of the tenth century. He
quotes as his authority an envoy sent from some Caucasian prince to
the king of the Russians.]
[Footnote 11: As in modern Greek; see also Bullmann's Gram. sec. 3. 2.]
[Footnote 12: See Rees' Cyclopedia, art. _Khazares_; where however it
is incorrectly said, that they were a Turkish tribe.]
[Footnote 13: _Posadnik_ is about the same as _mayor_.]
[Footnote 14: In the Slavic version of the Chronicle of Dalmatia, the
Epistles instead of the Palter are named.]
[Footnote 15: That the Glagolitic alphabet, as has been affirmed, was
the one invented by Cyril, and was gradually changed into that
afterwards known as the Cyrillic, is an untenable position; partly,
because no form of writing _could_ change in such a degree in one or
two
|