FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110  
111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   >>   >|  
with a brief intermission, until December, 1783. It is perhaps necessary to mention that both British and French asserted, and assert to this day, that the other party abandoned the field.[53] The point is too trivial, in the author's opinion, to warrant further discussion of an episode the historical interest of which is very slight, though its professional lessons are valuable. The British case had the advantage--through the courts-martial--of the sworn testimony of twenty to thirty captains, who agreed that the British kept on the same tack under short sail throughout the night, and that in the morning only three French ships were visible. As far as known to the author, the French contention rests only on the usual reports. [Footnote 38: _Ante_, pp. 61, 62.] [Footnote 39: Testimony of Captains Hood, Robinson, and Macbride, and of Rear-Admiral Campbell, captain of the fleet to Keppel.] [Footnote 40: See note on preceding page.] [Footnote 41: A vessel is said to be on the port tack when she has the wind blowing on her port, or left side; on the starboard tack, when the wind is on the right side. Thus with an east wind, if she head north, she is on the starboard tack; if south, on the port.] [Footnote 42: See also note; _post_, p. 200.] [Footnote 43: Twenty-two degrees.] [Footnote 44: Column and line ahead are equivalent terms, each ship steering in the wake of its next ahead.] [Footnote 45: Forty-five degrees.] [Footnote 46: Chevalier says, p. 89, "The English passed out of range" of these ships. As these ships had the wind, they had the choice of range, barring signals from their own admiral. In truth, they were obeying his order.] [Footnote 47: This evidence of the captains of the _Ocean_ and the _Elizabeth_ contradicts Palliser's charge that his ship was not adequately supported.] [Footnote 48: It was actually quite equal, but this was due to an accidental explosion on board the _Formidable_.] [Footnote 49: Chevalier. Probably later by the other times used in this account.] [Footnote 50: The Order of Battle was constituted by the ships "of the line" ranging themselves one behind the other in a prescribed succession; the position of each and the intervals between being taken from the ship next ahead. This made the leading vessel the pivot of the order and of manoeuvring, unless specially otherwise directed; which in an emergency could not always be easily done. Strictly, if circumsta
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110  
111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Footnote

 

French

 

British

 

captains

 

starboard

 

degrees

 
Chevalier
 

vessel

 
author
 
charge

obeying

 
admiral
 
adequately
 

December

 
evidence
 

Elizabeth

 
intermission
 

Palliser

 
contradicts
 

signals


steering

 
equivalent
 

assert

 

asserted

 

mention

 

choice

 

barring

 

supported

 

English

 

passed


leading

 

prescribed

 

succession

 
position
 
intervals
 

manoeuvring

 

easily

 

Strictly

 

circumsta

 

specially


directed

 

emergency

 
explosion
 

Formidable

 
accidental
 
Probably
 

Battle

 
constituted
 
ranging
 

account