FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195  
196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   >>   >|  
o revert to the Greeks, from whom Virgil's imitation of the Iliad drew us aside, favour me with your opinion of Plato. [Footnote 48: See Mr. Landor's "Imaginary Conversations."--Vol. i. p. 44, and ii. p. 322, note.] [Footnote 50: Vol. i p. 269, 270.] [Footnote 51: Vol. i. p. 300.] _Landor_.--Plato is disingenuous and malicious. I fancy I have detected him in more than one dark passage, a dagger in his hand and a bitter sneer on his countenance.[52] He stole (from the Eyptian priests and other sources) every idea his voluminous books convey. [53] Plato was a thief. _North_.--"Taffy was a Welshman, Taffy was a thief." _Landor_.--Do you mean to insinuate that my dialogues are stolen from Plato's? _North_.--Certainly not, Mr. Landor; there is not the remotest resemblance between them. Lucian and Christopher North are your models. What do you think of Aristotle? _Landor_.--In Plato we find only arbours and grottoes, with moss and shell work all misplaced. Aristotle has built a solider edifice, but has built it across the road. We must throw it down again. [54] _North_.--So much for philosophy. What have you to say to Xenophon as an historian? _Landor_.--He is not inelegant, but he is unimpassioned and affected; [55] and he has not even preserved the coarse features of nations and of ages in his Cyropaedia.[56] _North_.--The dunce! But what of the Anabasis? _Landor_.--You may set Xenophon down as a writer of graceful mediocrity.[57] _North_.--Herodotus? _Landor_.--If I blame Herodotus, whom can I commend? His view of history was nevertheless like that of the Asiatics, and there can be little to instruct and please us in the actions and speeches of barbarians.[58] _North_.--Which of the Greek tragedians do you patronise? _Landor_.--Aeschylus is not altogether unworthy of his reputation; he is sometimes grand, but oftener flighty and obscure.[59] _North_.--What say you of Sophocles? _Landor_.--He is not so good as his master, though the Athenians thought otherwise. He is, however, occasionally sublime. _North_.--What of Euripides? [60] _Landor_.--He came further down into common life than Sophocles, and he further down than Aeschylus: one would have expected the reverse. Euripides has but little dramatic power. His dialogue is sometimes dull and heavy; the construction of his fable infirm and inartificial, and if in the chorus he assumes another form, and becomes a more elevate
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195  
196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Landor

 
Footnote
 
Herodotus
 

Euripides

 
Aeschylus
 
Aristotle
 
Sophocles
 

Xenophon

 

features

 

coarse


Asiatics
 
actions
 

affected

 
instruct
 
nations
 

preserved

 
writer
 

graceful

 

Anabasis

 

mediocrity


Cyropaedia

 

commend

 

history

 

altogether

 

dramatic

 

reverse

 

dialogue

 
expected
 
common
 

construction


elevate

 

assumes

 
chorus
 

infirm

 

inartificial

 

sublime

 

unworthy

 

unimpassioned

 

reputation

 
oftener

patronise

 

tragedians

 

barbarians

 

flighty

 
obscure
 

thought

 

occasionally

 

Athenians

 

master

 

speeches