FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196  
197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   >>   >|  
d poet, he is still at a loss to make it serve the interests of the piece. He appears to have written principally for the purpose of inculcating political and moral axioms. The dogmas, like _valets de place_, serve any master, and run to any quarter. Even when new, they are nevertheless miserably flat and idle. _North_.--Aristophanes ridiculed him. _Landor_.--Yes, Aristophanes had, however, but little true wit. [61] _North_.--That was lucky for Euripides. _Landor_.-A more skilful archer would have pierced him through bone and marrow, and saved him from the dogs of Archelaus. _North_.--That story is probably an allegory, signifying that Euripides was after all worried out of life by the curs of criticism in his old age. _Landor_.--As our Keats was in his youth, eh, Mr. North? A worse fate than that of Aeschylus, who had his skull cracked by a tortoise dropt by an eagle that mistook his bald head for a stone. _North_.--Another fable of his inventive countrymen. He died of brain-fever, followed by paralysis, the effect of drunkenness. He was a jolly old toper: I am sorry for him. You just now said that Aristophanes wanted wit. What foolish fellows then the Athenians must have been, in the very meridian of their literature, to be so delighted with what they mistook for wit as to decree him a crown of olive! He has been styled the Prince of Old Comedy too. How do you like Menander? [Footnote 52: Vol. ii. p. 298.] [Footnote 53: Vol. iii p. 514.] [Footnote 54: Vol. iv. p 80.] [Footnote 55: Vol. i. p. 233.] [Footnote 56: Vol. ii. p. 331.] [Footnote 57: Vol. iii. p. 35.] [Footnote 58: Vol. ii. p. 332.] [Footnote 59: Vol. i. pp. 299, 298, 297.] [Footnote 60: Vol. i. p. 298.] [Footnote 61: Vol. ii. p. 12.] _Landor_.--We have not much of him, unless in Terence. [62] The characters on which Menander raised his glory were trivial and contemptible. [Footnote 62: Vol. ii. p. 5. At p. 6th, Mr. Landor produces some verses of his own "in the manner of Menander," fathers them on Andrew Marvel, and makes Milton praise them!] _North_.--Now that you have demolished the Greeks, let us go back to Rome, and have another touch at the Latins. From Menander to Terence is an easy jump. How do you esteem Terence? _Landor_.--Every one knows that he is rather an expert translator from the Greek than an original writer. There is more pith in Plautus. _North_.--You like Plautus, then, and endure Terence
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196  
197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Footnote

 
Landor
 
Terence
 

Menander

 
Aristophanes
 
mistook
 
Euripides
 

Plautus

 

literature

 

styled


Prince
 
decree
 

Comedy

 
delighted
 
contemptible
 

Latins

 
Greeks
 

demolished

 

esteem

 

writer


original

 

endure

 

translator

 

expert

 

praise

 

raised

 

trivial

 
characters
 
Andrew
 

fathers


Marvel

 

Milton

 
manner
 

produces

 

verses

 

paralysis

 

ridiculed

 

miserably

 

skilful

 
archer

Archelaus

 

allegory

 

marrow

 

pierced

 
interests
 

appears

 

written

 

principally

 

purpose

 

inculcating