FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350  
351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   >>   >|  
ght to introduce a more logical system of interpunction. Thus was laid the foundation of our present system; which, however, was not perfected till after the invention of the art of printing. In the opinion of some, the use of the dot, at least to some extent, was earlier than stichometry. From the eighth or ninth century punctuation in manuscripts became more common and systematic. In _cursive_ manuscripts--those that employ the running hand with large and small letters and the separation of the words, a style of writing that became the common one from the ninth century and onward--punctuation also prevails, though not according to any one established system. Tregelles, _ubi sup_. Various other particulars interesting to those who study the Greek text in the original, as those relating to the accents, the smooth and rough breathing, and the iota subscript, are here omitted. 7. We come next to consider the _ancient divisions_ made in the _contents_ of the sacred text. _Chapters_ are very early mentioned, as by Tertullian and Dionysius of Alexandria. But it is uncertain whether any thing more is meant than parts or sections of given contents. The earliest formal division of the four gospels that has come down to us consists of the _Ammonian sections_ (Greek _kephalaia_, _heads_ or _chapters_), so named from Ammonius of Alexandria, who, about the middle of the third century, prepared a harmony of the four gospels--_the Gospel by four_, as Eusebius calls it. His plan was, to arrange in the order of Matthew the parallel passages side by side, interpolating those that were wanting in Matthew. To this end, he divided each of the gospels into sections the length of which was very various, being wholly determined by the parallelisms of the other gospels. Of these sections Matthew contained 355; Mark, 234 (in Wordsworth's Greek Testament, 236 are given); Luke, 342; John, 231 (in Wordsworth's Greek Testament, 232). The infelicity of this arrangement was that, with the exception of the first gospel, the true order of the evangelists was broken up--"The train of sequence of the three was destroyed in respect to the orderly course of reading," as Eusebius says (Letter to Carpianus, given in Wordsworth's Greek Testament). To remedy this evil, Eusebius, bishop of Caesarea, in the following century connected with these Ammonian sections his _ten canons_. These are ten tables, arran
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350  
351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

sections

 

century

 

gospels

 
Eusebius
 

Matthew

 

Wordsworth

 

Testament

 

system

 

common

 
manuscripts

Alexandria

 
contents
 
punctuation
 

Ammonian

 
parallel
 

connected

 

interpolating

 

wanting

 
passages
 
canons

Ammonius

 
chapters
 

tables

 

middle

 
kephalaia
 

divided

 

prepared

 
harmony
 

Gospel

 

arrange


wholly

 

Carpianus

 

Letter

 

gospel

 

remedy

 

arrangement

 

exception

 

reading

 

evangelists

 

destroyed


respect

 

orderly

 
sequence
 

broken

 

infelicity

 

determined

 

parallelisms

 
Caesarea
 

length

 

contained