FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198  
199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   >>   >|  
; Schmidt, _Kultuebertragungen_, 1910, pp. 47 ff. 2. Herodotus, II, 42, 171.--Cf. n. 4. 3. AElius Aristides, VIII, 56 (I, p. 96, ed. Dindorf). Cf. Plut., _De Iside et Osiride_, ed. Parthey, p. 216. 4. Plut., _De Is. et Osir._, 28; cf. Otto, _Priester und Tempel_, II, pp. 215 ff.--This Timotheus is undoubtedly the same one that wrote about the Phrygian mysteries; see _infra_, n. 79.--The question, to what extent the Hellenistic cult had the form ascribed to it by Plutarch and Apuleius immediately after its creation, is still unsettled; see Otto, _Priester und Tempel_, II, p. 222. We do not appear to have any direct proof of the existence of "mysteries" of Isis and Serapis {230} prior to the Empire, but all probabilities are in favor of a more ancient origin, and the mysteries were undoubtedly connected with the ancient Egyptian esoterism.--See _infra_, n. 78. 5. Diogenes Laertius, V, 5, Sec. 76: [Greek: Hothen kai tous paianas poiesai tous mechri nun haidomenous]. The [Greek: mechri nun] Diogenes took undoubtedly from his source, Didymus. See Artemidorus, _Onirocr._, II, 44 (p. 143, 25 Hercher).--This information is explicitly confirmed by an inscription which mentions [Greek: he hiera taxis ton paianiston] (_Inscr. Graec._, XIV, 1034). 6. Kaibel, _Epigr._ 1028 = Abel, _Orphica_, p. 295, etc.--See _supra_, ch. I, n. 14.--According to recent opinion, M. de Wilamowitz was good enough to write me, the date of the Andros hymn cannot have been later than the period of Cicero, and it is very probably contemporary with Sulla.--See _supra_, ch. I, n. 14.--On other similar texts, see Gruppe, _Griech. Mythol._, P. 1563. 7. Amelung, _Le Serapis de Bryaxis_ (_Revue archeol_, 1903, II), p. 178. 8. P. Foucart, _Le culte de Dionysos en Attique_ (_Mem. Acad. des Inscr._, XXXVII), 1904. On the Isis cult in ancient Greece, we can now refer to Gruppe, _Griech. Myth._, pp. 1565 ff.; Ruhl, _De Sarapide et Iside in Graecia cultis_ (Diss. Berlin) 1906, has made careful use of the epigraphic texts dating back to the time before the Roman period. 9. The only exception is the Zeus Ammon, who was only half Egyptian and owed his very early adoption to the Greek colonies of Cyrene; see Gruppe, _Griech. Myth._, p. 1558. The addition of other goddesses, like Nephtis or Bubastis to Isis is exceptional. 10. Concerning the impression which Egypt made on travelers, see Friedlaender, _Sittengesch._, II^6, 144 ff.; Otto, _Priester und Tem
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198  
199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Gruppe

 

undoubtedly

 

Priester

 

mysteries

 

Griech

 

ancient

 
Egyptian
 

Serapis

 

Diogenes

 

mechri


Tempel
 

period

 

Wilamowitz

 

Bryaxis

 

opinion

 

archeol

 

According

 

Amelung

 
recent
 

similar


Foucart

 
Cicero
 

contemporary

 

Mythol

 

Andros

 
colonies
 

adoption

 
Cyrene
 

goddesses

 

addition


exception

 

Nephtis

 

travelers

 

Friedlaender

 

Sittengesch

 

impression

 

Bubastis

 
exceptional
 

Concerning

 

Greece


XXXVII
 
Dionysos
 

Attique

 
careful
 
epigraphic
 
dating
 

Graecia

 

Sarapide

 

cultis

 

Berlin