FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243  
244   245   246   >>  
n the Theurge, who lived under Marcus Aurelius. The latter was Considered the author of the [Greek: Logia Chaldaika], which in a measure became the Bible of the last neo-Platonists. 67. Apul., _De Magia_, c. 27. The name [Greek: philosophos], _philosophus_, was finally applied to all adepts in the occult sciences. 68. The term seems to have been first used by Julian, called the Theurge, and thence to have passed to Porphyry (_Epist. Aneb._, c. 46; Augustine, _Civ. Dei_, X, 9-10) and to the neo-Platonists. 69. Hubert, article cited, pp. 1494, n. 1; 1499 f.; 1504. Ever since magical papyri were discovered in Egypt, there has been a tendency to exaggerate the influence exercised by that country on the development of magic. It made magic prominent as we have said, but a study of these same papyri proves that elements of very different origin had combined with the native sorcery, which seems to have laid special stress upon the importance of the "barbarian names," because to the Egyptians the name had a reality quite independent of the object denoted by it, and possessed an effective force of its own (_supra_, pp. 93, 95). But that is, after all, only an incidental theory, and it is significant that in speaking of the origin of magic, Pliny (XXX, 7) names the Persians in the first place, and does not even mention the Egyptians. 70. _Mon. myst. Mithra_, I, pp. 230 ff.--Consequently Zoroaster, the undisputed master of the magi, is frequently considered a disciple of the Chaldeans or as himself coming from Babylon. The blending of Persian and Chaldean beliefs appears clearly in Lucian, _Necyom._, 6 ff. {280} 71. The majority of the magical formulas attributed to Democritus are the work of forgers like Bolos of Mendes (cf. Diels, _Fragmente der Vorsokratiker_, I^2, pp. 440 f.), but the authorship of this literature could not have been attributed to him, had not these tendencies been so favorable. 72. On Jewish magic see: Blau, _Das altjuedische Zauberwesen_, 1898; cf. Hubert, _loc. cit._, p. 1505. 73. Pliny, _H. N._, XXX, 1, Sec. 6; Juvenal, VI, 548 ff. In Pliny's opinion these magicians were especially acquainted with _veneficas artes_. The toxicology of Mithridates goes back to that source (Pliny, XXV, 2, 7). Cf. Horace, _Epod._, V, 21; Virgil, _Buc._ VIII, 95, etc. 74. Cf. _supra_, pp. 151 ff. 75. Minucius Felix, _Octavius_, 26; cf. _supra_, ch. VI, p. 152. 76. In a passage outlining the Persian demonology
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243  
244   245   246   >>  



Top keywords:

papyri

 

Hubert

 

Persian

 

origin

 

attributed

 

Egyptians

 

magical

 

Theurge

 

Platonists

 

Lucian


Necyom

 

Minucius

 

appears

 
veneficas
 

Chaldean

 

Octavius

 
beliefs
 
acquainted
 

forgers

 

Democritus


majority

 

formulas

 
blending
 

Babylon

 

master

 

undisputed

 

outlining

 

passage

 

demonology

 

Zoroaster


toxicology

 

Consequently

 

frequently

 

coming

 

Mithridates

 

considered

 

disciple

 

Chaldeans

 

Zauberwesen

 

altjuedische


Horace

 

Mithra

 

opinion

 
Juvenal
 

source

 

Jewish

 

Vorsokratiker

 

Virgil

 
Fragmente
 
Mendes