FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30  
31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   >>   >|  
the pipe being supplied by the City. LOCATION AND DESIGN OF RETAINING WALLS. The plans, from the earliest stages, contemplated founding the retaining wall on the surface of the rock, where of suitable quality, and afterward excavating the rock in front of the toe of the wall to sub-grade. This plan was definitely adopted soon after the borings were completed, on account of the great danger of blasting out large quantities of rock in timbered trenches close to buildings founded on soft material, and also to avoid the additional cost and delay that would have been caused by carrying the walls to sub-grade. The retaining walls in Seventh Avenue, south of the viaduct, and in Ninth Avenue, north of the viaduct, were not governed by the same conditions as in the streets. The dip and quality of the rock at both points required that the walls be carried to sub-grade, and they are, in fact, face walls; the Ninth Avenue wall, in particular, having little thrust to sustain, is very light. The results aimed at in the design and location of the retaining walls in 31st and 33d Streets were: _First._--A perfectly stable wall under all conditions that might reasonably be expected; _Second._--As much room as possible at the elevation of the top of rail; _Third._--The least necessary interference with adjoining property during construction; and, _Fourth._--The most economical wall that would fulfill the other conditions. As stated in the paper by Alfred Noble, Past-President, Am. Soc. C. E., the third stipulation required the relinquishing of a portion of the space under these streets granted by the City, but it was finally decided not to approach the south house line of 31st Street with the back of the walls nearer than 9 ft., while on 33d Street the extreme position of the back was fixed at the north line, as there were no buildings, except those belonging to the Railroad Company, on the house line at the low points in the rock. The assumptions made in designing the wall were as follows: _First._--Weight of concrete, 140 lb. per cu. ft. _Second._--Weight of material from the surface of the ground to a depth of 12 ft. (which was shown by tests made in bore-holes to be the elevation of the ground-water surface), 100 lb. per cu. ft.; and angle of repose, 30 degrees. The distance of 12 ft. below the surface was the depth of the inverts of the sewers, which undoubt
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30  
31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
surface
 

conditions

 

Avenue

 

retaining

 

viaduct

 

Street

 
material
 
streets
 

points

 
Second

elevation

 

required

 
buildings
 

ground

 

Weight

 

quality

 

adjoining

 

stipulation

 
portion
 
relinquishing

interference

 

President

 
economical
 
fulfill
 

degrees

 

construction

 

Fourth

 
stated
 

Alfred

 

distance


property

 

granted

 

extreme

 

position

 
inverts
 

nearer

 
assumptions
 

belonging

 
Railroad
 

Company


designing

 

undoubt

 

finally

 
decided
 

sewers

 

concrete

 

approach

 

repose

 

borings

 
completed