FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   822   823   824   825   826   827   828   829   830   831   832   833   834   835   836   837   838   839   840   841   842   843   844   845   846  
847   848   849   850   851   852   853   854   855   856   857   858   859   860   861   862   863   864   865   866   867   868   869   870   871   >>   >|  
Conference, 15 Jul 64, p. 13.] [Footnote 23-34: Memo, DASD (CR) for Roy Davenport, et al., 5 May 64, sub: Requests for Suit by Military Personnel Under the Civil Rights Bill; idem for ASD (M), 10 Jul 64, sub: DOD Instruction on Processing of Requests by Military Personnel for the Bringing of Civil Rights Suits by the Attorney General; both in ASD (M) 291.2. For an example of a service response, see Memo, Dep Under SA (Pers Management) for DASD (CR), 9 Jul 64, same sub, ASD (M) 291.2.] [Footnote 23-35: DOD Instr 5525.2, 24 Jul 64, Processing of Requests by Military Personnel for Action by the Attorney General Under the Civil Rights Act; see also Memo, ASD (M) for Under SA et al., 24 Jul 64, same sub, ASD (M) 291.2.] Finally in December, McNamara issued a directive spelling out his department's obligations under the act's controversial Title VI, Nondiscrimination in Federally Assisted Programs.[23-36] This directive was one of a series requested by the White House from various governmental agencies and reviewed by the Justice Department and the Bureau of the Budget in an attempt to coordinate the federal government's activities under the far-reaching Title VI provision.[23-37] After arranging for the circulation of the directive throughout the services, Secretary McNamara explained in considerable detail how grants and loans of federal funds, transfer, sale, or lease of military property, and in fact any federal assistance would be denied in cases where discrimination could be found. Although this directive would affect the Department of Defense chiefly through the National Guard and various civil defense programs, it was (p. 592) nevertheless a potential source of economic leverage for use by the armed forces in the fight against discrimination.[23-38] Furthermore, this directive, unlike McNamara's equal opportunity directive of the previous year, was supported by federal legislation and thus escaped the usual criticism suffered by his earlier directives on discrimination. [Footnote 23-36: DOD Directive 5500.11, 28 Dec 64.] [Footnote 23-37: Memo, ASD (M) for Dir, BOB, 15 Jul
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   822   823   824   825   826   827   828   829   830   831   832   833   834   835   836   837   838   839   840   841   842   843   844   845   846  
847   848   849   850   851   852   853   854   855   856   857   858   859   860   861   862   863   864   865   866   867   868   869   870   871   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
directive
 

federal

 

Footnote

 

McNamara

 
Rights
 

Requests

 
Personnel
 

discrimination

 
Military
 
Department

Processing

 

General

 

Attorney

 

denied

 

affect

 
Defense
 
chiefly
 

Although

 

grants

 
considerable

detail

 

transfer

 

property

 

military

 

assistance

 

explained

 

forces

 

Furthermore

 
unlike
 
supported

previous

 
opportunity
 

escaped

 

leverage

 

economic

 

defense

 

directives

 
programs
 

Directive

 
legislation

earlier

 

potential

 

source

 
criticism
 
suffered
 

National

 

Management

 

service

 

response

 

December