FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771   772   773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782  
783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   797   798   799   800   801   802   803   804   805   806   807   >>   >|  
ittee's report to the Vice President for comment. Indicative of the Pentagon's continuing influence in the committee's work, the Kennedy letter had been drafted by Gesell and Yarmolinsky; see Memo, Yarmolinsky for White, 8 Jun 63, White Collection, J. F. Kennedy Library.] [Footnote 21-58: Memo, SecDef for SA et al., 27 Jun 63, sub: Report of the President's Committee on Equal Opportunity in the Armed Forces; see also Memo, ASD (M) for SecDef, 27 Jun 63; both in ASD (M) 291.2.] [Footnote 21-59: Memo, Dep Under SA (M) for SecDef (ca. 10 Jul 63), with service comments attached, copy in ASD (M) 291.2.] [Footnote 21-60: Memo, SecNav for ASD (M), 10 Jul 63, sub; Report of the President's Committee on Equal Opportunity in the Armed Forces, SecNav file 5410, GenRecsNav.] [Footnote 21-61: Memo, SecAF for ASD (M), 10 Jul 63, sub: Air Force Response to the Gesell Committee Report, SecAF files.] Despite the opposition to these recommendations, Fitt saw room for compromise between the committee and the services. Noting, for example, that the services wanted to do their own monitoring of their commander's performance, Fitt agreed this would be acceptable so long as the Secretary of Defense could monitor the monitors. Adding that officers, like other human beings, tended to concentrate on the tasks that would be reviewed by superiors, he wanted to see a judgment of a commander's ability to handle discrimination matters included in (p. 547) the narrative portion of his efficiency report. On the question of sanctions, Fitt pointed out to McNamara that the services now understood that their equal opportunity responsibilities extended beyond the limits of the military reservation but that several of their objections to the use of sanctions were sound. He suggested the secretary approve the use of sanctions in discrimination cases but place severe restraints on their imposition, restricting the decision to the secretary's office. [Illustration: ALFRED FITT.] This suggestion no doubt pleased McNamara. Although the committee's recommendations might be
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771   772   773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782  
783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   797   798   799   800   801   802   803   804   805   806   807   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Footnote

 

SecDef

 
sanctions
 

Committee

 

Report

 

services

 

President

 
committee
 

SecNav

 

recommendations


Opportunity

 

Forces

 

wanted

 

secretary

 

McNamara

 
discrimination
 

Yarmolinsky

 
commander
 

report

 

Gesell


Kennedy

 

efficiency

 

question

 
pointed
 

opportunity

 

understood

 
portion
 

reviewed

 
superiors
 

concentrate


beings
 
tended
 
Collection
 
judgment
 

responsibilities

 

included

 

matters

 

ability

 

handle

 

narrative


military

 
Illustration
 

ALFRED

 

office

 

decision

 

imposition

 

restricting

 
Although
 
pleased
 

suggestion