FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   769   770   771   772   773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793  
794   795   796   797   798   799   800   801   802   803   804   805   806   807   808   809   810   811   812   813   814   815   816   817   818   >>   >|  
epartment of Defense to demand pertinent (p. 554) racial statistics from the states. For psychological advantages, it wanted the recent liberalization of guard policies toward Negroes widely publicized. Again suggesting voluntary methods as a first step, the committee called for the use of economic sanctions if voluntary methods failed. The President should lose no time in applying the provisions of the new Civil Rights Act of 1964, which forbade the use of federal funds in discriminatory activities, to offending states. As it had been in the case of discrimination in local communities, the committee was optimistic about the success of voluntary compliance. Citing its own efforts and those of the National Guard Bureau,[21-86] the committee reported that the last ten states to hold out had now begun to integrate their guard units at least on a token basis. In fact, the committee's report had to be revised at the last minute because Alabama and Mississippi enrolled Negroes in their enlisted ranks. [Footnote 21-86: The National Guard Bureau is a joint agency of the Departments of the Army and Air Force which acts as adviser to the service staffs on National Guard matters and as the channel of communication between the two departments and the state guards. The chief of the bureau is always a National Guard officer.] Chairman Gesell circulated a draft report containing these findings and recommendations among committee members in September 1964.[21-87] His colleagues suggested only minor revisions, although Whitney Young thought that some of the space spent on complimenting the services could be better used to emphasize the committee's recommendations for further reform. He did not press the point but noted wryly: "if we were as sensitive about the feelings of the victims of discrimination as we are of the perpetuators, we wouldn't have most of these problems to begin with."[21-88] Maj. Gen. Winston P. Wilson, the Chief of the National Guard Bureau, also reviewed the draft and found it "entirely fair, temperate and well-founded."[21-89] The committee's final report was sent to the President on 20 November 1964. A month later Johnson sent it along to McNamara with the request that he be kept informed on progress of the negotiations between the secretary and the governors on integration of t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   769   770   771   772   773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793  
794   795   796   797   798   799   800   801   802   803   804   805   806   807   808   809   810   811   812   813   814   815   816   817   818   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
committee
 

National

 

voluntary

 

Bureau

 
report
 

states

 
President
 

discrimination

 
recommendations
 
methods

Negroes

 

complimenting

 

emphasize

 

reform

 

services

 
circulated
 
findings
 

members

 

Gesell

 
Chairman

bureau

 

officer

 

September

 

Whitney

 

thought

 

revisions

 

colleagues

 

suggested

 
victims
 
November

founded

 
temperate
 

Johnson

 

negotiations

 

progress

 

secretary

 

governors

 
integration
 

informed

 
McNamara

request

 

reviewed

 

sensitive

 
feelings
 
guards
 

perpetuators

 

wouldn

 

Winston

 

Wilson

 

problems