FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   802   803   804   805   806   807   808   809   810   811   812   813   814   815   816   817   818   819   820   821   822   823   824   825   826  
827   828   829   830   831   832   833   834   835   836   837   838   839   840   841   842   843   844   845   846   847   848   849   850   851   >>   >|  
ument for removing racial designations, for the civil rights experts both within and outside the department demanded more detailed racial statistics to protect and enlarge the equal opportunity gains of the sixties. The demand was also supported by representatives of the smaller racial minorities who, joining in the civil rights revolution, developed a self-awareness that made detailed racial and ethnic statistics mandatory. The shift was made possible to a great extent by the change in public opinion toward racial minorities. As one civil rights official later noted, the change in attitude had caused black servicemen to reconsider their belief that detrimental treatment necessarily followed racial identification.[22-67] Ironically, just a decade after the McNamara directive on equal opportunity, a departmental civil rights official, himself a Negro, was defending the use of photographs in the selection process on the grounds that such procedures were necessary in any large organization where individuals were relatively unknown to their superiors.[22-68] So strong had the services' need for black officers become, it could be argued, that a promotion board's knowledge of a candidate's race redounded to the advantage of the black applicants. For whatever reason, the pressure to eliminate racial indicators from personnel forms had largely disappeared at the end of the 1960's. [Footnote 22-67: Memo, Bennett for ASD (M) and DASD (Civ Pers, Indus Rels, and CR), 8 Dec 66, copy in CMH.] [Footnote 22-68: Interv, author with Johnson, 9 Aug 73.] The Gesell Committee's investigations also forced the Department of Defense to consider the possibility of discrimination in the rarefied area of embassy and special mission assignments and the certainty of discrimination against black servicemen in local communities near some overseas bases. Concerning the former, the staff of the civil rights deputy concluded that such assignments were voluntary and based on special selection procedures. Race was not a factor except for three countries where assignments were "based on politically ethnic considerations."[22-69] Nevertheless, Fitt began to discuss with the services ways to attract more qualified black volunteers for (p. 578) assignments to attache, mission, and military assistance groups. [Footnote 22-69: Memo, Exec
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   802   803   804   805   806   807   808   809   810   811   812   813   814   815   816   817   818   819   820   821   822   823   824   825   826  
827   828   829   830   831   832   833   834   835   836   837   838   839   840   841   842   843   844   845   846   847   848   849   850   851   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

racial

 

rights

 
assignments
 

Footnote

 

official

 

servicemen

 

services

 
ethnic
 

discrimination

 

selection


procedures

 

mission

 

special

 

change

 

opportunity

 
detailed
 

statistics

 
minorities
 

Interv

 

author


largely

 

Gesell

 

Committee

 
Johnson
 

personnel

 

indicators

 
assistance
 

groups

 
Bennett
 

disappeared


investigations
 
volunteers
 
factor
 
voluntary
 

concluded

 

deputy

 

qualified

 

attract

 

discuss

 

Nevertheless


considerations

 
countries
 

politically

 

Concerning

 

rarefied

 

attache

 

embassy

 
possibility
 
military
 

Department