FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   757   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771   772   773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781  
782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   797   798   799   800   801   802   803   804   805   806   >>   >|  
uld judge the country's adherence to its basic principles.[21-56] [Footnote 21-56: Ibid., pp. 92-93.] _Reaction to a New Commitment_ The Gesell Committee's conclusion that discrimination in the community was tied to military efficiency meshed well with the civil rights philosophy of the New Frontier. Responding to the committee's (p. 546) report, President Kennedy cited "the interests of national defense, national policy and basic considerations of human decency" to justify his administration's interest in opening public accommodations and housing to black servicemen. He considered it proper to ask the "military community to take a leadership role" in the matter and asked Secretary McNamara to review the committee's recommendations.[21-57] The secretary, in turn, personally asked the service secretaries to comment on the recommendations and assigned the Deputy Under Secretary of the Army (Manpower), Alfred B. Fitt, to act as coordinator and draw up the Defense Department's reply.[21-58] The comments thus solicited revealed that some of McNamara's senior subordinates had not been won over by the committee's arguments that the services should take an active role in community race relations.[21-59] The sticking point at all levels involved two important recommendations: the rating of commanders on their handling of racial matters and the use of economic sanctions. In regard to the proposal to close bases in communities that persisted in racial discrimination, the Secretary of the Navy said bluntly: "Do not concur. Base siting is based upon military requirements."[21-60] These officials promised that commanders would press for voluntary compliance, but for more aggressive measures they preferred to wait for the passage of federal legislation--they had in mind the administration's civil rights bill then being considered by Congress--which would place the primary responsibility for the protection of a serviceman's civil rights in another federal department. The Secretary of the Air Force suggested that the services continue to plan, but defer action on the committee's recommendations until Congress acted on the civil rights bill.[21-61] [Footnote 21-57: Ltr, President to SecDef, 21 Jun 63, copy in CMH. The President also sent the comm
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   757   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771   772   773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781  
782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   797   798   799   800   801   802   803   804   805   806   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
rights
 

recommendations

 

Secretary

 

committee

 
community
 

military

 
President
 

Congress

 
national
 
federal

administration

 

commanders

 

services

 

racial

 

considered

 
McNamara
 
Footnote
 

discrimination

 

proposal

 
communities

regard

 

economic

 

sanctions

 

persisted

 

siting

 

concur

 

bluntly

 

matters

 
protection
 
relations

sticking

 
levels
 

handling

 

rating

 

important

 

involved

 

passage

 
primary
 

preferred

 
aggressive

measures

 

legislation

 

continue

 
department
 
suggested
 

SecDef

 

requirements

 

serviceman

 

responsibility

 

officials