FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680  
681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   >>   >|  
ights Act of 1957, examined complaints of voting discrimination and denials of equal protection under the law. Both Eisenhower and Kennedy dispatched federal officials to investigate and prosecute violations of voting rights in several states. But civil rights progress was still painfully slow in the 1950's. The fight for civil rights in that decade graphically demonstrated a political fact of life: any profound change in the nation's social system requires the concerted efforts of all three branches of the national government. In this case the Supreme Court had done its part, repeatedly attacking segregation in many spheres of national life. The executive branch, on the other hand, did not press the Court's decisions as thoroughly as some had hoped, although Eisenhower certainly did so forcibly and spectacularly with federal troops at Little Rock in 1957. The dispatch of paratroopers to Little Rock,[19-11] a memorable example of federal intervention and one popularly associated with civil rights, had, in fact, little to do with civil rights, but was rather a vivid example of the exercise of executive powers in the face of a threat to federal judicial authority. Where the _Brown_ decision was concerned, Eisenhower's view of judicial powers was narrow and his leadership antithetical to the Court's call for "all deliberate speed." He even withheld his support in school desegregation cases. Eisenhower was quite frank about the limitations he perceived in his power and, by inference, his duty to effect civil rights reforms. Such reforms, he believed, were a matter of the heart and, as he explained to Congressman Powell in 1953, could not be achieved by means of laws or directives or the action of any one person, "no matter with how much authority and forthrightness he acts."[19-12] [Footnote 19-11: For an authoritative account of Little Rock, see Robert W. Coakley's "Operation Arkansas," Center of Military History Study 158M, 1967. See also Paul J. Scheips, "Enforcement of the Federal Judicial Process by Federal Marshals," in _Bayonets in the Streets; The Use of Troops in Civil Disturbances_, ed. Robin Higham (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1969), pp. 39-42.] [Footnote 19-12: Ltr, Eisenhower to Powell, 6 Jun 53, G 124-A-1,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680  
681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

rights

 

Eisenhower

 

federal

 

Little

 

national

 

matter

 

Federal

 

authority

 

Powell

 
powers

Footnote

 
executive
 
reforms
 

judicial

 
voting
 

directives

 

person

 

action

 
achieved
 

withheld


desegregation

 

inference

 

perceived

 
effect
 
school
 

limitations

 

explained

 

Congressman

 

believed

 

support


Coakley

 
Higham
 

Lawrence

 

University

 

Disturbances

 

Streets

 

Bayonets

 

Troops

 
Kansas
 

Marshals


Process
 
Robert
 

Operation

 

Arkansas

 

account

 

authoritative

 

Center

 
Military
 

Scheips

 
Enforcement