FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56  
57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   >>   >|  
d to do so: "We heartily consent to your receiving large compensations in Asia Minor," said the Russian Minister at Athens, in the presence of his British colleague, to a high official of the Greek Ministry for Foreign Affairs. "But as to Constantinople, we prefer that you should not come there; it would afterwards be painful for you and disagreeable for everybody to turn you out." [22] M. Venizelos knew these views perfectly well, and did not covet Constantinople: what he coveted, so far as material gains went, were the large compensations in Asia Minor.[23] There lay the chief objective of his strategy, and its net outcome was to widen the breach between him and those elements in the country which still believed that the policy of Greece must be governed by the solid necessities of the Balkan situation, not by nebulous visions of Imperialist expansion. [1] Psycha to Venizelos, Bucharest, 23 Oct./6 Nov.; Venizelos to Greek Legations, London, Bordeaux, Petersburg, 24 Oct./7 Nov., 1914. [2] Romanos, Bordeaux, 19 Nov., 1914. [3] He explained, three years afterwards, that at the time of making his offer of 18 Aug., 1914, he bore in mind "the impossibility of going to Servia's assistance on account of the danger from Bulgaria."--_Orations_, p. 93. But precisely similar was the objection to going against Turkey without a guarantee of Bulgarian neutrality: only the Bulgars, in the one case, would have been on Greece's left flank and in the other on the right. The truth seems to be that the vision of M. Venizelos lacked the penetration which, in matters of this sort, can only come from long study and reflection. [4] First Memorandum, 11/24 Jan., in the _Nea Hellas_, 21 March (O.S.), 1915. [5] Gennadius, London, 10 Aug. (O.S.), 1914. [6] _Orations_, p. 43. [7] Second Memorandum, 17/30 Jan., in the _Nea Hellas_, 22 March (O.S.), 1915. [8] See his own statement in the _Nea Hellas_, 22 March (O.S.), 1915. [9] Dragoumis, Petrograd, 16 Feb., 1915. [10] Dardanelles Commission, First Report, pp. 14-5, 31-3; Final Report, pp. 6-8. [11] Deville, pp. 163, 215. [12] _Orations_, pp. 103, 104. [13] Dardanelles Commission, Supplement to First Report, p. 3. [14] _Orations_, pp. 105-6. [15] See Extracts from the Crown Council Minutes, in the _Balkan Review_, Dec., 1920, pp. 384-5, which supplement M. Venizelos's very meagre account of these proceedings in _Orations_, pp. 107-8. [16] _Orations_, pp
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56  
57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Orations
 
Venizelos
 
Hellas
 

Report

 

Dardanelles

 
Balkan
 
Greece
 

London

 

Memorandum

 

account


Bordeaux

 
Commission
 

compensations

 

Constantinople

 
penetration
 

matters

 

reflection

 

supplement

 

Minister

 

Athens


presence

 

colleague

 

British

 

lacked

 

vision

 
Bulgars
 
guarantee
 

Bulgarian

 
neutrality
 

proceedings


meagre

 

Russian

 

Extracts

 

consent

 

heartily

 
Deville
 

Supplement

 

Petrograd

 

Dragoumis

 

Gennadius


Council

 

Minutes

 
Review
 

Second

 

statement

 
receiving
 
similar
 

elements

 

country

 
breach