FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122  
123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   >>   >|  
d. M. Briand was bent on bringing Greece into the War, not because he thought her help could exercise a decisive influence over its course, but because he wanted her to share in the spoils under French auspices: he considered it France's interest to have in the Eastern Mediterranean a strong Greece closely tied to her.[19] {104} That programme France intended to carry through at all costs and by all means. England and Russia, for the sake of the paramount object of the War, acquiesced and co-operated. But the acquiescence was compulsory and the co-operation reluctant. The underlying disaccord between the three Allies reflected itself in the demeanour of their representatives at Athens. M. Guillemin, the French Minister, stood before the Greek Government violently belligerent. Brute force, accentuated rather than concealed by a certain irritating finesse, seemed to be his one idea of diplomacy, and he missed no conceivable opportunity for giving it expression: so much so that after a time the King found it impossible to receive him. Sir Francis Elliot, the British Minister, formed a pleasing contrast to his French colleague: a scrupulous and courteous gentleman, he did not disguise his repugnance to a policy involving at every step a fresh infringement of a neutral nation's rights. As it was, he endeavoured to moderate proceedings which he could neither approve nor prevent. Prince Demidoff, a Russian diplomat of amiable manners, seconded Sir Francis Elliot's counsels of moderation and yielded to M. Guillemin's clamours for coercion.[20] It is important to bear this disaccord in mind in order to understand what went before and what comes hereafter: for, though for the most part latent, it was always present; and if it did not avert, it retarded the climax. [1] _Orations_, p. 155; Skouloudis's _Semeioseis_, p. 36. [2] _White Book_, Nos. 70-4, 79, 81, 84, 86-90. [3] _White Book_, Nos. 92, 93, 96-102. [4] _White Book_, No. 104. [5] _White Book_, Nos. 106, 111, 113. [6] _White Book_, Nos. 110, 112, 116. [7] _White Book_, Nos. 117-20, 134, 135; Skouloudis's _Apantesis_, pp. 25-6. [8] _White Book_, Nos. 95, 105, 126, 130-33, 137. The instructions of 27 April had been issued chiefly in consequence of information that bands of Bulgarian irregulars (_Comitadjis_) were at that moment preparing to cross the frontier. Skouloudis's _Apantesis_, p. 23. [9] The charge was supported by garbled
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122  
123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
French
 

Skouloudis

 

Francis

 
Elliot
 

France

 
Apantesis
 

Greece

 

Minister

 

disaccord

 

Guillemin


Orations

 
Semeioseis
 

present

 

latent

 

climax

 

retarded

 

Demidoff

 

Prince

 

Russian

 
diplomat

manners

 

amiable

 
prevent
 

proceedings

 

moderate

 

approve

 

seconded

 
counsels
 

understand

 
important

yielded

 

moderation

 

clamours

 

coercion

 
issued
 

chiefly

 

information

 
consequence
 

instructions

 

Bulgarian


charge

 
supported
 

garbled

 

frontier

 

Comitadjis

 

irregulars

 

moment

 

preparing

 

endeavoured

 

formed