FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166  
167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   >>   >|  
of the inviolability assured to diplomats by International Law, but also of a formal promise given by the French and British Ministers to Premier Zaimis when the Allied Fleet arrived at the Piraeus--viz. that the missions of the Powers at war with the Entente had absolutely nothing to fear. It asked that the decision might be revoked.[4] Our representatives experienced no difficulty in disposing of this protest. The promise given was merely "an act of spontaneous courtesy"--it had not "any character of a definite, irrevocable engagement"--"and could not, in any case, have for effect to guarantee the Ministers of countries at war with the Entente against the consequences of hostile acts foreign to their diplomatic functions and contrary to the neutrality of Greece"--acts of espionage and intrigue which, as a matter of fact, form an integral part of a diplomat's functions. They did not, therefore, "deem it possible to ask Admiral Dartige du Fournet to revoke the decision taken by him in virtue of the powers with which he was invested." [5] {154} Thus the Ministers of Germany, Austria, Turkey, and Bulgaria were bundled off (22 November), protesting vigorously "against the outrages committed on four diplomatic representatives in neutral territory," characterising the things which took place at Athens as "beyond all comment," and wondering "whether a firmer attitude would not have spared the country these affronts on its sovereignty." [6] This unprecedented measure added still further to the irritation of the Greeks, and the manner in which it was executed--without even a show of the courtesies prescribed between diplomats by the tradition of centuries--shocked the very man who acted as the executioner. Not for the first time had Admiral Dartige been made to serve ends which he did not understand, by means which he did not approve, in association with persons whom he could not respect. But the worst was yet to come. The Greek Premier delivered his answer to the Admiral's claim on 22 November. In that answer M. Lambros showed that the Allies had already "compensated themselves" amply: the war material which they had appropriated--not to mention the light flotilla--being superior both in quantity and in quality to anything that had been abandoned to their enemies. Then he went on to state that the surrender of any more material would be equivalent to a departure from neutrality; and the Central Powers, which
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166  
167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Ministers

 

Admiral

 

representatives

 

answer

 

neutrality

 

Dartige

 

November

 

diplomatic

 

functions

 

Premier


Powers

 

material

 

promise

 

diplomats

 

Entente

 

decision

 

courtesies

 

prescribed

 
equivalent
 

Greeks


manner

 
executed
 

tradition

 

shocked

 

centuries

 

irritation

 

surrender

 

spared

 

country

 
Central

attitude
 

comment

 

wondering

 

firmer

 
affronts
 
unprecedented
 
measure
 

sovereignty

 
departure
 

Allies


superior

 

delivered

 

Lambros

 

appropriated

 

mention

 

flotilla

 

respect

 

compensated

 

showed

 

understand