FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   967   968   969   970   971   972   973   974   975   976   977   978   979   980   981   982   983   984   985   986   987   988   989   990   991  
992   993   994   995   996   997   998   999   1000   1001   1002   1003   1004   1005   1006   1007   1008   1009   1010   1011   1012   1013   1014   1015   1016   >>   >|  
eficiency of gratitude, because the virtue of gratitude, as stated above (Q. 106, A. 6), inclines to return something more. Wherefore ingratitude is properly denominated from being a deficiency of gratitude. Now every deficiency or privation takes its species from the opposite habit: for blindness and deafness differ according to the difference of sight and hearing. Therefore just as gratitude or thankfulness is one special virtue, so also is ingratitude one special sin. It has, however, various degrees corresponding in their order to the things required for gratitude. The first of these is to recognize the favor received, the second to express one's appreciation and thanks, and the third to repay the favor at a suitable place and time according to one's means. And since what is last in the order of generation is first in the order of destruction, it follows that the first degree of ingratitude is when a man fails to repay a favor, the second when he declines to notice or indicate that he has received a favor, while the third and supreme degree is when a man fails to recognize the reception of a favor, whether by forgetting it or in any other way. Moreover, since opposite affirmation includes negation, it follows that it belongs to the first degree of ingratitude to return evil for good, to the second to find fault with a favor received, and to the third to esteem kindness as though it were unkindness. Reply Obj. 1: In every sin there is material ingratitude to God, inasmuch as a man does something that may pertain to ingratitude. But formal ingratitude is when a favor is actually contemned, and this is a special sin. Reply Obj. 2: Nothing hinders the formal aspect of some special sin from being found materially in several kinds of sin, and in this way the aspect of ingratitude is to be found in many kinds of sin. Reply Obj. 3: These three are not different species but different degrees of one special sin. _______________________ THIRD ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 107, Art. 3] Whether Ingratitude Is Always a Mortal Sin? Objection 1: It seems that ingratitude is always a mortal sin. For one ought to be grateful to God above all. But one is not ungrateful to God by committing a venial sin: else every man would be guilty of ingratitude. Therefore no ingratitude is a venial sin. Obj. 2: Further, a sin is mortal through being contrary to charity, as stated above (Q. 24, A. 12). But ingratitude is contrary to charit
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   967   968   969   970   971   972   973   974   975   976   977   978   979   980   981   982   983   984   985   986   987   988   989   990   991  
992   993   994   995   996   997   998   999   1000   1001   1002   1003   1004   1005   1006   1007   1008   1009   1010   1011   1012   1013   1014   1015   1016   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

ingratitude

 

gratitude

 

special

 

received

 

degree

 

stated

 

deficiency

 
recognize
 
virtue
 
aspect

contrary

 

formal

 

degrees

 

return

 

venial

 

Therefore

 

species

 

mortal

 
opposite
 

guilty


contemned

 

hinders

 

materially

 
Nothing
 

material

 

eficiency

 

charit

 

committing

 
pertain
 

unkindness


charity

 

ARTICLE

 

Objection

 

Mortal

 
Ingratitude
 
Whether
 

Further

 

grateful

 

Always

 

ungrateful


forgetting

 

things

 

appreciation

 

express

 
required
 

inclines

 

thankfulness

 

privation

 
properly
 

denominated