FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   974   975   976   977   978   979   980   981   982   983   984   985   986   987   988   989   990   991   992   993   994   995   996   997   998  
999   1000   1001   1002   1003   1004   1005   1006   1007   1008   1009   1010   1011   1012   1013   1014   1015   1016   1017   1018   1019   1020   1021   1022   1023   >>   >|  
y "vengeance we resist force, or wrong, and in general whatever is obscure" [*_Obscurum._ Cicero wrote _obfuturum_ but the sense is the same as St. Thomas gives in the parenthesis] "(i.e. derogatory), either by self-defense or by avenging it." Therefore vengeance is a special virtue. Reply Obj. 1: Just as repayment of a legal debt belongs to commutative justice, and as repayment of a moral debt, arising from the bestowal of a particular favor, belongs to the virtue of gratitude, so too the punishment of sins, so far as it is the concern of public justice, is an act of commutative justice; while so far as it is concerned in defending the rights of the individual by whom a wrong is resisted, it belongs to the virtue of revenge. Reply Obj. 2: Fortitude disposes to vengeance by removing an obstacle thereto, namely, fear of an imminent danger. Zeal, as denoting the fervor of love, signifies the primary root of vengeance, in so far as a man avenges the wrong done to God and his neighbor, because charity makes him regard them as his own. Now every act of virtue proceeds from charity as its root, since, according to Gregory (Hom. xxvii in Ev.), "there are no green leaves on the bough of good works, unless charity be the root." Reply Obj. 3: Two vices are opposed to vengeance: one by way of excess, namely, the sin of cruelty or brutality, which exceeds the measure in punishing: while the other is a vice by way of deficiency and consists in being remiss in punishing, wherefore it is written (Prov. 13:24): "He that spareth the rod hateth his son." But the virtue of vengeance consists in observing the due measure of vengeance with regard to all the circumstances. _______________________ THIRD ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 108, Art. 3] Whether Vengeance Should Be Wrought by Means of Punishments Customary Among Men? Objection 1: It seems that vengeance should not be wrought by means of punishments customary among men. For to put a man to death is to uproot him. But our Lord forbade (Matt. 13:29) the uprooting of the cockle, whereby the children of the wicked one are signified. Therefore sinners should not be put to death. Obj. 2: Further, all who sin mortally seem to be deserving of the same punishment. Therefore if some who sin mortally are punished with death, it seems that all such persons should be punished with death: and this is evidently false. Obj. 3: Further, to punish a man publicly for his sin seems to publish his
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   974   975   976   977   978   979   980   981   982   983   984   985   986   987   988   989   990   991   992   993   994   995   996   997   998  
999   1000   1001   1002   1003   1004   1005   1006   1007   1008   1009   1010   1011   1012   1013   1014   1015   1016   1017   1018   1019   1020   1021   1022   1023   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

vengeance

 

virtue

 

Therefore

 

justice

 

belongs

 

charity

 

punishment

 
consists
 
regard
 
punished

Further

 

measure

 

repayment

 

punishing

 

commutative

 

mortally

 

hateth

 

spareth

 
circumstances
 

ARTICLE


observing

 

evidently

 

wherefore

 
publish
 

exceeds

 

cruelty

 

brutality

 

deficiency

 
written
 

remiss


publicly

 

punish

 

Wrought

 

uproot

 
deserving
 
customary
 

forbade

 

children

 

cockle

 

wicked


sinners

 

signified

 

punishments

 

Should

 
uprooting
 

Vengeance

 

Whether

 

Punishments

 
wrought
 

Objection