FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28  
29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   >>  
such MSS. as name the 18th of April ought to be respected; but Tyrwhitt's "28th," which he states not only as the result of his own conjecture but as authorised by the "the best MSS.," ought to be scouted at once. In the latest edition of the "Canterbury Tales" (a literal reprint from one of the Harl. MSS., for the Percy Society, under the supervision of Mr. Wright), the opening of the Prologue to "The Man of Lawes Tale" does not materially differ from Tyrwhitt's text, excepting in properly assigning the day of the journey to "the eightetene day of April;" and the confirmation of the forenoon altitude is as follows: "And sawe wel that the schade of every tree Was in the lengthe the same quantite, That was the body erecte that caused it." But the afternoon observation is thus related: "By that the Manciple had his tale endid, The sonne fro the southe line is descendid So lowe that it nas nought to my sight, Degrees nyne and twenty as in hight. _Ten_ on the clokke it was as I gesse, For eleven foote, or litil more or lesse, My schadow was at thilk time of the yere, Of which feet as my lengthe parted were, In sixe feet equal of proporcioun." In a note to the line "Ten on the clokke" Mr. Wright observes, "_Ten_. I have not ventured to change the reading of the Harl. MS., which is partly supported by that of the lands. MS., _than_." If the sole object were to present an exact counterpart of the MS., of course even its errors were to be respected: but upon no other grounds can I understand why a reading should be preserved by which broad sunshine is attributed to ten o'clock at night! Nor can I believe that the copyist of the MS. with whom the error must have originated would have set down anything so glaringly absurd, unless he had in his own mind some means of reconciling it with probability. It may, I believe, be explained in the circumstance that "ten" and "four," in horary reckoning, were _convertible terms_. The old Roman method of naming the hours, wherein noon was the sixth, was long preserved, especially in conventual establishments: and I have no doubt that the English idiomatic phrase "o'clock" originated in the necessity for some distinguishing mark between hours "of the clock" reckoned from midnight, and hours of the day reckoned from sunrise, or more frequently from six A.M. With such an understanding, it is clear that _ten_ might be called _four_, and _four ten_,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28  
29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   >>  



Top keywords:

lengthe

 

reading

 

originated

 

clokke

 
preserved
 

Wright

 

Tyrwhitt

 

respected

 

reckoned

 

understand


grounds

 

sunrise

 

sunshine

 
frequently
 
midnight
 
attributed
 

object

 

present

 

partly

 

supported


called

 

errors

 

counterpart

 
understanding
 

distinguishing

 

circumstance

 
horary
 
reckoning
 

convertible

 
explained

reconciling
 

probability

 
establishments
 

conventual

 
naming
 

method

 

necessity

 
copyist
 

English

 

idiomatic


absurd

 
phrase
 

glaringly

 

properly

 
assigning
 

journey

 

excepting

 

materially

 
differ
 

eightetene