FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28  
29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   >>  
such MSS. as name the 18th of April ought to be respected; but Tyrwhitt's "28th," which he states not only as the result of his own conjecture but as authorised by the "the best MSS.," ought to be scouted at once. In the latest edition of the "Canterbury Tales" (a literal reprint from one of the Harl. MSS., for the Percy Society, under the supervision of Mr. Wright), the opening of the Prologue to "The Man of Lawes Tale" does not materially differ from Tyrwhitt's text, excepting in properly assigning the day of the journey to "the eightetene day of April;" and the confirmation of the forenoon altitude is as follows: "And sawe wel that the schade of every tree Was in the lengthe the same quantite, That was the body erecte that caused it." But the afternoon observation is thus related: "By that the Manciple had his tale endid, The sonne fro the southe line is descendid So lowe that it nas nought to my sight, Degrees nyne and twenty as in hight. _Ten_ on the clokke it was as I gesse, For eleven foote, or litil more or lesse, My schadow was at thilk time of the yere, Of which feet as my lengthe parted were, In sixe feet equal of proporcioun." In a note to the line "Ten on the clokke" Mr. Wright observes, "_Ten_. I have not ventured to change the reading of the Harl. MS., which is partly supported by that of the lands. MS., _than_." If the sole object were to present an exact counterpart of the MS., of course even its errors were to be respected: but upon no other grounds can I understand why a reading should be preserved by which broad sunshine is attributed to ten o'clock at night! Nor can I believe that the copyist of the MS. with whom the error must have originated would have set down anything so glaringly absurd, unless he had in his own mind some means of reconciling it with probability. It may, I believe, be explained in the circumstance that "ten" and "four," in horary reckoning, were _convertible terms_. The old Roman method of naming the hours, wherein noon was the sixth, was long preserved, especially in conventual establishments: and I have no doubt that the English idiomatic phrase "o'clock" originated in the necessity for some distinguishing mark between hours "of the clock" reckoned from midnight, and hours of the day reckoned from sunrise, or more frequently from six A.M. With such an understanding, it is clear that _ten_ might be called _four_, and _four ten_,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28  
29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   >>  



Top keywords:

lengthe

 

reading

 

originated

 

clokke

 

preserved

 

Wright

 
Tyrwhitt
 

respected

 
reckoned
 
understand

grounds

 
sunrise
 
sunshine
 

frequently

 
midnight
 

attributed

 
object
 

present

 
partly
 

supported


called

 
errors
 

counterpart

 

understanding

 

distinguishing

 

circumstance

 

horary

 

reckoning

 

convertible

 

explained


reconciling

 

probability

 

establishments

 
conventual
 
naming
 

method

 

necessity

 

copyist

 

English

 

idiomatic


absurd

 

phrase

 
glaringly
 

properly

 
assigning
 
journey
 

excepting

 
materially
 
differ
 

eightetene