FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45  
46   >>  
in England." The conflicting accounts and confusion in the history of the Tradescants, have no doubt arisen from the three, "grandsire, father, and son," having been all named John; consequently, for the sake of perspicuity, I shall adopt the plan of our worthy editor, and designate the Tradescant who first settled in England, No. 1.; his son, who published the _Musaeum Tradescantianum_, No. 2.; and the son of the latter, who "died in his spring," No. 3. Now, to prove that it was the youngest of the Tradescants, No. 3., who died in 1652, we have only to refer to the preface of the _Musaeum Tradescantianum_, which was published in 1656. There we find that Tradescant No. 2. says that-- "About three years agoe (by the perswasion of some friends) I was resolved to take a catalogue of those rarities and curiosities, which my father had sedulously collected, and myself with continued diligence have augmented and hitherto preserved together." He then proceeds to account for the delay in the publication of the work in these words: "Presently thereupon my _onely son_ died, one of my friends fell sick," &c. Again, in Ashmole's _Diary_ we find the following entry: "_Sept._ 11th, 1652. Young John Tredescant died." And, further on, Ashmole states that "He was buried by his grandfather, in Lambeth Churchyard." The word _by_, in the quotation, meaning, _by the side of_, _close by_ his grandfather. The burial register of Lambeth parish gives the date of the interment, Sept. 16, 1652. Ashmole's _Diary_, as quoted by DR. RIMBAULT, and the burial register also, give the date of the death of Tradescant No. 2., who survived his son ten years: the family then became extinct. Ashmole, who became acquainted with the Tradescants in 1650, never mentions the grandfather (No. 1.), nor is his name to be found in the burial registry; and consequently the date of his death, as far as I have read, has always been set down as uncertain. There are other parish records, however, than burial registers; and I was well repaid for my search by finding, in the Churchwardens' Accounts of St. Mary's, Lambeth, the following entries: "1634. June 1. Received for burial of Jane, wife of John Tradeskin, 12s." "1637-8. Item. John Tradeskin; ye gret bell and black cloth, 5s. 4d." This last entry, in all probability, marks the date of the death of the first Tradescant. Assuming that it does,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45  
46   >>  



Top keywords:

burial

 

Ashmole

 

Tradescant

 

Tradescants

 
grandfather
 

Lambeth

 

Tradescantianum

 

friends

 

England

 

Musaeum


published

 

father

 

register

 
parish
 
Tradeskin
 
mentions
 

registry

 

meaning

 

family

 

survived


interment

 

acquainted

 

extinct

 
RIMBAULT
 

quoted

 

finding

 
Received
 
probability
 

Assuming

 
records

uncertain
 

registers

 
Accounts
 

entries

 
Churchwardens
 

quotation

 

repaid

 
search
 

youngest

 

spring


designate

 
settled
 

preface

 

resolved

 
perswasion
 

editor

 

worthy

 

arisen

 
history
 

conflicting