FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45  
46   >>  
in England." The conflicting accounts and confusion in the history of the Tradescants, have no doubt arisen from the three, "grandsire, father, and son," having been all named John; consequently, for the sake of perspicuity, I shall adopt the plan of our worthy editor, and designate the Tradescant who first settled in England, No. 1.; his son, who published the _Musaeum Tradescantianum_, No. 2.; and the son of the latter, who "died in his spring," No. 3. Now, to prove that it was the youngest of the Tradescants, No. 3., who died in 1652, we have only to refer to the preface of the _Musaeum Tradescantianum_, which was published in 1656. There we find that Tradescant No. 2. says that-- "About three years agoe (by the perswasion of some friends) I was resolved to take a catalogue of those rarities and curiosities, which my father had sedulously collected, and myself with continued diligence have augmented and hitherto preserved together." He then proceeds to account for the delay in the publication of the work in these words: "Presently thereupon my _onely son_ died, one of my friends fell sick," &c. Again, in Ashmole's _Diary_ we find the following entry: "_Sept._ 11th, 1652. Young John Tredescant died." And, further on, Ashmole states that "He was buried by his grandfather, in Lambeth Churchyard." The word _by_, in the quotation, meaning, _by the side of_, _close by_ his grandfather. The burial register of Lambeth parish gives the date of the interment, Sept. 16, 1652. Ashmole's _Diary_, as quoted by DR. RIMBAULT, and the burial register also, give the date of the death of Tradescant No. 2., who survived his son ten years: the family then became extinct. Ashmole, who became acquainted with the Tradescants in 1650, never mentions the grandfather (No. 1.), nor is his name to be found in the burial registry; and consequently the date of his death, as far as I have read, has always been set down as uncertain. There are other parish records, however, than burial registers; and I was well repaid for my search by finding, in the Churchwardens' Accounts of St. Mary's, Lambeth, the following entries: "1634. June 1. Received for burial of Jane, wife of John Tradeskin, 12s." "1637-8. Item. John Tradeskin; ye gret bell and black cloth, 5s. 4d." This last entry, in all probability, marks the date of the death of the first Tradescant. Assuming that it does,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45  
46   >>  



Top keywords:

burial

 

Ashmole

 

Tradescant

 

Tradescants

 

grandfather

 

Lambeth

 
Tradescantianum
 

friends

 
England
 
Musaeum

published

 
father
 
register
 

parish

 
Tradeskin
 

mentions

 
registry
 

meaning

 
family
 

survived


interment

 
acquainted
 

extinct

 

RIMBAULT

 

quoted

 

finding

 

Received

 

probability

 

Assuming

 

records


uncertain

 

registers

 

Accounts

 
entries
 
Churchwardens
 

quotation

 

repaid

 

search

 

youngest

 

spring


designate

 

settled

 
preface
 

resolved

 
perswasion
 
editor
 

worthy

 
arisen
 
history
 

conflicting