ween for allowing the Hadj pilgrims to pass
from Damascus to Mecca.
B. _On the Fellahheen_, _or peasants of Wadi Moosa_.
The most experienced travellers that have visited Petra, have remarked
that these men are of a different race from the Bedaween Arabs around
them. They are ugly, bad in expression of countenance, and have a
reputation for cruelty and treachery.
Laborde says, that the Alaween looked upon them "with contempt _and
fear_." Lord Lindsay says, that Shaikh Hhussain, from 'Akabah, "was _in
fear_ all the time of being there." Irby and Mangles were told by the
Jehaleen that these Fellahheen murdered thirty Moslem pilgrims from
Barbary, the year before their visit.
Dr Wilson stayed among them longer, I believe, than any other European,
and he did not like them, yet found them gradually improve under civil
treatment, which always, like some other things,
"Emollit mores nec sinit esse feros."
He divides them into two classes as cultivators of land. First, Those
residing in a village called _Eljy_; and, second, Those residing in tents
under one Abu Zeitoon.
He describes them as a very exclusive people, never intermarrying with
Arabs, nor burying in common grounds with them; and having a different
set of personal names among them from those used by Arabs, which names
greatly resemble those found in the Old Testament Scriptures.
He concludes that they are descendants of the ancient Edomites.
A most remarkable circumstance that he observed, was their calling
themselves children of Israel, (Beni Israin.) This he regards as a
feeble traditional reminiscence of their proselytism to the faith of
Israel by the sword of the Maccabaean conquerors.
For my own part, I distinctly aver that during the altercation upon my
arrival there, between them and my Jehaleen, I did hear the words
"children of Israel" used. I had not chosen to take a part in the
conference, or to remain long at a time among the disputants, but only
passed occasionally in and out of the tent, and my mind was chiefly
engrossed with the subject-matter in hand, so that on hearing the words,
"children of Israel," I thought they were alluding to some history or
tradition of the Hebrew people. But afterwards, on connecting the fact
with Dr Wilson's assertion, I cannot but consider it very remarkable.
But the whole subject of these Fellahheen seems to merit closer attention
from those who have the leisure and opportunity for it.
|