FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35  
36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   >>   >|  
gnty, and virtually admit its complicity in a crime which it had steadily disavowed. As the full text of the ultimatum first reached the Foreign Chancelleries nearly twenty-four hours after its service upon Servia, the other European nations had barely a day to consider what could be done to preserve the peace of Europe before that peace was fatally compromised. [English "White Paper," No. 5; Russian "Orange Paper," No. 3.] Further confirmation that the German Foreign Office did have advance knowledge of at least the substance of the ultimatum is shown by the fact that on the same day the ultimatum was issued the Chancellor of the German Empire instructed the German Ambassadors in Paris, London, and St. Petersburg to advise the English, French, and Russian Governments that "the acts as well as _the demands_ of the Austro-Hungarian Government cannot but be looked upon as justified." [German "White Paper," Annex 1B.] How could Germany thus indorse the "demands" if it did not know the substance of the ultimatum? The hour when these instructions were sent is not given, so that it does not follow that these significant instructions were necessarily prior to the service of the ultimatum at Belgrade at 6 P.M. Nevertheless, as the ultimatum did not reach the other capitals of Europe until the following day, as the diplomatic correspondence clearly shows, it seems improbable that the German Foreign Office would have issued this very carefully prepared and formal warning to the other powers on July the 23d unless it had not only knowledge of Austria's intention to serve the ultimatum but also at least of the substance thereof. While it may be that Germany, while indorsing in blank the policy of Austria, purposely refrained from examining the text of the communication, so that it could thereafter claim that it was not responsible for Austria's action--a policy which would not lessen the discreditable character of the whole business--yet the more reasonable assumption is that the simultaneous issuance of Austria's ultimatum at Belgrade and Germany's warning to the powers were the result of a concerted action and had a common purpose. No court or jury, reasoning along the ordinary inferences of human life, would question this conclusion for a moment. The communication for the German Foreign Office last referred to anticipates that Servia "will refuse to comply with these demands"--why, if they were justif
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35  
36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

ultimatum

 

German

 
Foreign
 
Austria
 
substance
 

demands

 

Office

 

Germany

 

Russian

 

instructions


powers

 

warning

 

issued

 

knowledge

 

English

 
Servia
 

service

 
communication
 

action

 
policy

Europe

 

Belgrade

 
thereof
 

refrained

 

indorsing

 

purposely

 

improbable

 

carefully

 

correspondence

 

prepared


formal

 
virtually
 

intention

 

examining

 

discreditable

 

question

 

conclusion

 

moment

 

inferences

 

reasoning


ordinary

 

referred

 

justif

 

comply

 

anticipates

 

refuse

 
character
 
business
 
diplomatic
 

lessen