FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76  
77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   >>   >|  
a belligerent." (Article XVII. of The Hague Conference of 1907.) The question, therefore, arises, "Did Belgium commit acts in favor of one of Germany's opponents, if not actually hostile acts against Germany?" In order to understand Germany's charge that Belgium had committed such acts, attention must be directed to one of the most unfortunate stipulations of the Treaty of 1839, which compelled Belgium to maintain several fortresses. This meant that a small neutral people, sandwiched in between two great powers, had to keep itself informed on military affairs. Instead of being able to foster a peaceful state of mind, which is the surest guarantee of neutrality, the Belgians were forced to think military thoughts. [Illustration: ANDREW CARNEGIE _(Photo (c) by Underwood & Underwood.)_ _See Page 415_] [Illustration: JACOB H. SCHIFF _(Photo by American Press Assn.)_ _See Page 459_] In the eighties and early nineties they suspected France of designs on their integrity. Since then a change in the popular feeling has taken place and in recent years the instruction of the Belgian artillery, for instance, was intrusted to French officers in active service. These officers were constantly at home and very properly concerned with solving military problems such as a future war with Germany might present. What was more natural than that these same officers, when they were detached for a few months or years to Liege or Namur or Huy, taught their Belgian charges to prepare against a German attack, and to look upon the French as their friends and the Germans as their enemies? If conditions had been different, and German officers had been in charge of Belgian fortresses, the Belgian guns in practice would always have been trained on imaginary French invaders. French Officers in Belgian Forts. If this is understood it will be seen that in the case of war the actual neutrality of the Belgian garrisons would naturally be determined by the position taken by that nation whose officers had been in charge of the Belgian fortresses. And this might be entirely independent of the professed wishes of the Belgian people or their Government. If French officers in active service remained in the several fortresses, or even only in one after the beginning of hostilities, and if the French campaign plans contemplated an attack through Belgium, then Belgium had committed an "act in favor of France" by not forcing the French offic
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76  
77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Belgian
 

French

 

officers

 

Belgium

 

fortresses

 

Germany

 
charge
 
military
 

Underwood

 
people

France

 

German

 
attack
 

Illustration

 

neutrality

 

active

 

service

 

committed

 
months
 
contemplated

taught

 

properly

 
solving
 
charges
 

future

 

detached

 

natural

 
forcing
 

concerned

 

present


problems

 

Germans

 

actual

 

garrisons

 
naturally
 

determined

 
understood
 

position

 
nation
 

wishes


Government

 

remained

 

professed

 
independent
 

Officers

 

enemies

 

hostilities

 

conditions

 

campaign

 
friends