FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63  
64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   >>   >|  
with an army of 18,000,000 soldiers, (assumed for the purpose of argument,) mobilizes her army, professedly for defense against the United States. Could any fair-minded American possibly expect England to intercede with her ally, the United States, without first demanding the demobilization of Japan? Whose duty was it to yield? The actual fact is that Germany even then did not declare war against Russia until Russian soldiers had actually crossed not the Austrian but the German border. I may add that in writing the above I am prompted only by the very natural desire, viz., to impress upon the jury composed of the American people the one fact which should be given the most careful consideration in order to enable it to arrive at a just verdict in the case submitted, and this fact is "the mobilization of Russia." FRANK SEGGEBRUCH. New York, Oct. 29, 1914. In Defense of Austria _To the Editor of The New York Times:_ Referring to your editorial, "The Evidence Examined," in your Sunday edition, I wish to protest emphatically against your assertion that a "Court of Civilization" must inevitably come to the conclusion that Germany precipitated the war. There are still millions of civilized people who see these things quite differently. Mr. Beck makes out a case from the viewpoint of the accusing party--of course, nobody will doubt the legal abilities of Mr. Beck--but before the Supreme Court of Civilization there is also a law: audiatur et altera pars. Mr. Beck, as he presents the case to the court, has not mentioned very important points which, for the decision of the Supreme Court, would be most vital ones. At first the breach of Belgian neutrality, admitted and regretted by the German Government, has nothing to do with the question--who precipitated the war? It constituted only an action of the war itself. On the other hand, you call in your editorial the Austrian ultimatum a savage one and take it for granted that this ultimatum started the stone rolling and brought finally the general clash in Europe about. This presumption, when presented to the court, will have to be thoroughly proved, because there are many people, fair and just, as you consider yourself, who are convinced of the ample justification of this ultimatum. It is hardly describable how many criminal acts have been committed by Servians against the very existence of the Dual Monarchy for the last six years, under the eyes of th
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63  
64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

people

 

ultimatum

 
Austrian
 
German
 
Civilization
 

Russia

 

editorial

 

soldiers

 

United

 

States


precipitated

 

Germany

 

American

 

Supreme

 

points

 
regretted
 

decision

 
admitted
 

Belgian

 
breach

neutrality

 

altera

 
abilities
 

viewpoint

 

accusing

 

presents

 

mentioned

 

audiatur

 

important

 

presented


existence

 
proved
 

Servians

 

presumption

 

Europe

 

committed

 

justification

 

describable

 

convinced

 

general


criminal

 

action

 

constituted

 

question

 

rolling

 

brought

 
finally
 
started
 
Monarchy
 

savage