FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148  
149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   >>   >|  
Xi] in St. Luke--should be to our opponents a sign betraying the origin, though when it stands by itself--as in Eusebius, In Ps. iii.--I do not press the passage.] [3. Nor again does the reviewer seem to have noticed the effects of the context in shewing to which source a quotation is to be referred. It is a common custom for Fathers to quote v. 45 in St. Matthew, which is hardly conceivable if they had St. Luke vi. 27, 28 before them, or even if they were quoting from memory. Other points in the context of greater or less importance are often found in the sentence or sentences preceding or following the words quoted, and are decisive of the reference.] [The references as corrected are given in the note[334]. It will be seen by any one who compares the verifications with the reviewer's list, how his failure to observe the points just explained has led him astray. The effect upon the list given in The Traditional Text will be that before the era of St. Chrysostom twenty-five testimonies are given in favour of the Traditional Text of St. Matt. v. 44, and adding Tertullian from the Dean nine against it. And the totals on page 102, lines 2 and 3 will be 522 and 171 respectively.] Sec. 7. Especially have we need to be on our guard against conniving at the ejection of short clauses consisting of from twelve to fourteen letters,--which proves to have been the exact length of a line in the earliest copies. When such omissions leave the sense manifestly imperfect, no evil consequence can result. Critics then either take no notice of the circumstance, or simply remark in passing that the omission has been the result of accident. In this way, [[Greek: hoi pateres auton], though it is omitted by Cod. B in St. Luke vi. 26, is retained by all the Editors: and the strange reading of Cod. [Symbol: Aleph] in St. John vi. 55, omitting two lines, was corrected on the manuscript in the seventh century, and has met with no assent in modern times]. [Greek: EGAR] [Greek: SARXMOUALETHOS] [[Greek: ESTIBROSISKAI] [Greek: TOAIMAMOUALETHOS]] [Greek: ESTIPOSIS] But when, notwithstanding the omission of two or three words, the sense of the context remains unimpaired,--the clause being of independent signification,--then great danger arises lest an attempt should be made through the officiousness of modern Criticism to defraud the Church of a part of her inheritance. Thus [[Greek: kai hoi syn auto] (St. Luke viii. 45) is
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148  
149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

context

 

modern

 

Traditional

 

result

 
omission
 
corrected
 

points

 

reviewer

 

Critics

 

clauses


inheritance

 

ejection

 

accident

 

Church

 

passing

 

remark

 

notice

 
circumstance
 

simply

 

consequence


length
 
consisting
 

earliest

 

twelve

 

letters

 

proves

 

copies

 
manifestly
 

imperfect

 

omissions


fourteen

 
Criticism
 

assent

 
signification
 

independent

 

century

 
seventh
 
conniving
 

manuscript

 

danger


remains

 

ESTIPOSIS

 

notwithstanding

 

TOAIMAMOUALETHOS

 

ESTIBROSISKAI

 

clause

 
unimpaired
 

SARXMOUALETHOS

 
omitting
 

attempt