FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151  
152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   >>   >|  
t. xxi. 44, and not from St. Luke xx. 18, is, that they alike exhibit expressions which are peculiar to the earlier Gospel. The first is introduced by the formula [Greek: oudepote anegnote] (ver. 42: comp. Orig. ii. 794 c), and both exhibit the expression [Greek: epi ton lithon touton] (ver. 44), not [Greek: ep' ekeinon ton lithon]. Vainly is it urged on the opposite side, that [Greek: pas ho peson] belongs to St. Luke,--whereas [Greek: kai ho peson] is the phrase found in St. Matthew's Gospel. Chrysostom (vii. 672) writes [Greek: pas ho pipton] while professing to quote from St. Matthew; and the author of Cureton's Syriac, who had this reading in his original, does the same. [267] P. 193. [268] P. 11. [269] vii. 672 a [freely quoted as Greg. Naz. in the Catena of Nicetas, p. 669] xii. 27 d. [270] _Ap_. Mai, ii. 401 dis. [271] _Ap_. Chrys. vi. 171 c. [272] vii. 171 d. [273] iii^{2}. 86, 245: v. 500 e, 598 d. [274] 682-3 (Massuet 277). [275] iii. 786. [276] Theoph. 235-6 (= Mai, iv. 122). [277] ii. 660 a, b, c. [278] 'Praeterit et Lucifer.' [279] _Ap._ Galland. vi. 191 d. [280] Ibid. vii. 20 c. [281] Ibid. ix. 768 a. [282] [I am unable to find any place in the Dean's writings where he has made this explanation. The following note, however, is appended here]:-- With verse 43, the long lesson for the Monday in Holy-week (ver. 18-43) comes to an end. Verse 44 has a number all to itself (in other words, is sect. 265) in the fifth of the Syrian Canons,--which contains whatever is found exclusively in St. Matthew and St. Luke. [283] 'Omnino ex Lc. assumpta videntur.' [284] The section in St. Matthew is numbered 265,--in St. Luke, 274: both being referred to Canon V, in which St. Matthew and St. Luke are exclusively compared. [285] Vol. i. 13. [286] Letter to Pope Damasus. See my book on St. Mark, p. 28. [287] Dial. Sec. 78, _ad fin._ (p. 272). [288] Opp. ii. 215 a: v. part ii. 118 c. [289] See Holmes and Parsons' ed. of the LXX,--vol. iv. _in loc._ [290] Opp. pp. 143 and 206. P. 577 is allusive only. [291] Opp. vii. 158 c: ix. 638 b. [292] Opp. ii. 1345: iii. 763-4. [293] Sec. xv:--on which his learned editor (Bp. Jacobson) pertinently remarks,--'Hunc locum Prophetae Clemens exhibuisset sicut a Christo laudatam, S. Marc. vii. 6, si pro [Greek: apestin] dedisset [Greek: apechei].' [294] Opp. i. 1502: iii. 1114. [295] _Ap._ Epiphanium, Opp. i. 218 d. [
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151  
152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Matthew

 

exclusively

 

exhibit

 

Gospel

 
lithon
 
compared
 

Monday

 

Damasus

 

lesson

 

Letter


referred

 

Omnino

 

Syrian

 

assumpta

 

numbered

 

Canons

 

section

 
videntur
 

number

 

remarks


Prophetae
 
exhibuisset
 

Clemens

 

pertinently

 

Jacobson

 

learned

 

editor

 
Christo
 

Epiphanium

 

apechei


dedisset

 
laudatam
 

apestin

 
Parsons
 

Holmes

 

allusive

 
Lucifer
 
professing
 

author

 

Syriac


Cureton

 

pipton

 

writes

 

belongs

 

phrase

 

Chrysostom

 
freely
 

quoted

 
original
 

reading