FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   747   748   749   750   751   752   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771  
772   773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   >>   >|  
ries of problems existing "both service-wide and at particular bases."[21-28] Specifically, the group was not convinced by official reasons for the disproportionately small number of Negroes in some services, especially among the noncommissioned officers and in the officer corps. Chairman Gesell called the dearth of black officers a "shocking condition."[21-29] His group was particularly concerned with the absence of black officers on promotion boards and the possibility of unfairness in the promotion process where photos and racial and religious information were included in the selection files made available to these boards. It also noted the failure of the services to increase the number of black ROTC graduates. The committee considered and rejected the idea of providing preferential treatment for Negroes to achieve better representation in the services and in the higher grades.[21-30] [Footnote 21-28: The President's Committee on Equal Opportunity in the Armed Forces, "Initial Report: Equality of Treatment and Opportunity for Negro Military Personnel Stationed Within the United States, June 13, 1963" (hereafter cited as "Initial Rpt"), p. 10. The following discussion of the committee cannot carry the eloquence or force of the group's report, which was reproduced in the _Congressional Record_, 88th Cong., 1st sess., vol. 109, pp. 14359-69.] [Footnote 21-29: Ltr, Gesell to Under SecNav, 6 Feb 63, SecNav file 5420 (1179), GenRecsNav.] [Footnote 21-30: Intervs, author with Gesell, 13 May 72 and 3 Nov 74.] Overrepresentation of black enlisted men in certain supply and food services was obvious.[21-31] Here the committee was particularly critical of the Navy and the Marine Corps. On another score, the Chief of Naval Personnel noted that the committee "considers the Navy and Marines far behind the Army and Air Force, particularly in the area of community relations," a criticism, he admitted, "to some extent" justified.[21-32] So apparent was the justification that, at the suggestion of the Secretary of the Navy, Gesell discussed with Under Secretary Paul B. Fay, Jr., ways to better the Navy's record in its "areas of least progress."[21-33] Gesell later co
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   747   748   749   750   751   752   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771  
772   773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Gesell

 
services
 
committee
 

officers

 

Footnote

 

SecNav

 

Personnel

 

Initial

 
boards
 

promotion


Opportunity

 

number

 

Secretary

 

Negroes

 

Overrepresentation

 

GenRecsNav

 

record

 

author

 

Intervs

 

Record


Congressional
 

reproduced

 
report
 

enlisted

 

progress

 

discussed

 

suggestion

 

Marines

 

community

 

relations


extent

 

justified

 

admitted

 
criticism
 

justification

 

apparent

 

considers

 
obvious
 

supply

 

critical


Marine

 

Military

 

concerned

 

absence

 

possibility

 

unfairness

 

condition

 

called

 

dearth

 

shocking