FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   750   751   752   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771   772   773   774  
775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   797   798   799   >>   >|  
s. It reviewed the services' efforts to eliminate segregated housing, schooling, and public accommodations around the military reservations and found them wanting. Local commanders, the committee charged, were often naive about the existence of social problems and generally did not keep abreast of departmental policy specifying their obligations; they were especially ill-informed on the McNamara-Gilpatric directives and memorandums on equal treatment. Often quizzed on the subject, the commanders told the committee that they enjoyed very fine community relationships. To this Whitney (p. 541) Young would answer that fine community relationships and racial injustice were not necessarily exclusive.[21-39] [Footnote 21-39: Memo for Rcd, USAF Dep for Manpower, Personnel, & Organization, 14 Nov 62, sub: Meeting of the President's Committee on Equal Opportunity in the Armed Forces, SecAF file 2426-62.] [Illustration: THE GESELL COMMITTEE MEETS WITH THE PRESIDENT. _Left to right_: _Laurence I. Hewes III_, _Executive Secretary_; _Nathaniel S. Colley_; _Benjamin Muse_; _Gerhard A. Gesell_; _President Kennedy_; _Whitney M. Young, Jr._; _John H. Sengstacke_; and _Abe Fortas_.] This community-based discrimination, the committee found, had become a greater trial for black servicemen and their families because of its often startling contrast to their life in the services. There was even evidence that some of the off-base segregation, especially overseas, had been introduced through the efforts of white servicemen. Particularly irritating to the committee were restrictions placed on black participation in civil rights demonstrations protesting such off-base conditions. The committee wanted the restrictions removed.[21-40] [Footnote 21-40: Memo, Dep for Manpower, Personnel, & Organization, USAF, for SecAF, 25 Jan 63, sub: Meeting With President's Committee on Equal Opportunity in the Armed Forces, SecAF files. See also Memo for Rcd, Marine Corps Aide to SecNav, 30 Jan 63, sub: Meeting With Navy-Marine Corps Representatives on Equal Opportunity, SecNav file 5420 (1179), GenRecsNav.] In the end the committee's reputation would rest not so much on its carefully developed catalog of racial discrimination.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   750   751   752   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771   772   773   774  
775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   797   798   799   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

committee

 

President

 

community

 

Meeting

 

Opportunity

 

Footnote

 

Marine

 

relationships

 

SecNav

 
Whitney

racial

 
Manpower
 
servicemen
 

Committee

 
discrimination
 

Organization

 

Personnel

 

restrictions

 
Forces
 

efforts


commanders

 

services

 

overseas

 
segregation
 
public
 

accommodations

 

introduced

 

schooling

 

Particularly

 

irritating


families

 
military
 

reservations

 

greater

 

startling

 

contrast

 

evidence

 

participation

 
rights
 

GenRecsNav


Representatives
 
carefully
 

developed

 

catalog

 

reputation

 

reviewed

 

conditions

 
wanted
 

protesting

 
Fortas