FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   713   714   715   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726   727   728   729   730   731   732   733   734   735   736   737  
738   739   740   741   742   743   744   745   746   747   748   749   750   751   752   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762   >>   >|  
disrupting good community relations. The commander should remain interested, but he should leave the work to his judge advocate so that the commander would not personally be "caught in the middle" to the detriment of his community relations program. If local authorities refused to cooperate, the matter should be referred to higher authority who might pursue it with local government officials. Such procedures might keep the commander from becoming embroiled in locally sensitive issues.[20-53] In short, discrimination was to be fought through voluntary action at the local command level, but nothing was to be done that might compromise the commander's standing with the local authorities. [Footnote 20-53: Memo, Maj Gen Albert M. Kuhfeld, USAFJAG (for CofSAF), for ALMAJCOM (SJA), 2 Feb 62, sub: Air Force Policy Statement Concerning Violations of Anti-Discrimination Law, and attached Memo, Dep CofS, Pers, for ALMAJCOM, 30 Jan 62, same sub, SecAF files.] McNamara's office displayed the same good intentions and crippling inhibitions when it considered policy on the participation of servicemen in civil rights demonstrations. The secretary had inherited a policy from his predecessor who, in the wake of a series of sit-in demonstrations involving black airmen in the spring of 1960, had approved a plan devised by the judge advocate generals of the services and other Defense Department officials. Declaring such activity "inappropriate" in light of the services' mission, these officials banned the participation of servicemen in civil rights demonstrations and gave local commanders broad discretionary powers to prevent such participation, including the right to declare the place of demonstration off limits or to restrict servicemen to the base. Although all the services adopted the new policy, only the Air Force published detailed instructions.[20-54] [Footnote 20-54: Memo for Rcd, ASD (P), 23 Mar 60; Memo, Dep Chief, NavPers, for Asst SecNav (Pers and Reserve Forces), 23 Mar 60, sub: Considerations Relative to Department of Defense Policy Concerning Disputes Over Local Laws or Customs; copies of both in ASD (M) 291.2. For the Air Force instructions, see Memo, AF Dep CofS (P) for All Ma
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   713   714   715   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726   727   728   729   730   731   732   733   734   735   736   737  
738   739   740   741   742   743   744   745   746   747   748   749   750   751   752   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
commander
 

servicemen

 

participation

 

policy

 
demonstrations
 

officials

 
services
 

ALMAJCOM

 
Footnote
 
Defense

instructions

 

Department

 

rights

 

Concerning

 

Policy

 
community
 
authorities
 

relations

 

advocate

 
commanders

prevent

 

demonstration

 

declare

 

powers

 

including

 

discretionary

 

mission

 

devised

 
generals
 
approved

airmen

 
spring
 

inappropriate

 

activity

 

Declaring

 

banned

 

Disputes

 
Relative
 

Forces

 
Considerations

Customs

 

copies

 

Reserve

 
SecNav
 
adopted
 

Although

 

restrict

 

published

 

detailed

 

NavPers