FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726   727   728   729   730   731   732   733   734   735   736   737   738   739   740  
741   742   743   744   745   746   747   748   749   750   751   752   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   >>   >|  
rce Policy Statement Concerning Involvement of Air Force Personnel in Local Civil Disturbances, SecAF files; Ltr, Under SecNav to Jesse H. Turner, 6 Oct 61, copy in CMH. See also Ltr, Adam Yarmolinsky to Adam C. Powell, 30 Oct 63, SD 291.2 (14 Jul 63).] Such restrictions could not last much longer. Given the civil (p. 516) rights temper of the times--1963 witnessed the mammoth march on Washington, the introduction of President Kennedy's civil rights bill, and the landmark directive of the Secretary of Defense on equal opportunity in the armed forces--a total prohibition on servicemen's participation in demonstrations appeared more and more incongruous. Finally, on 16 July 1963, McNamara relaxed the department's policy. Still declaring such participation inappropriate and unnecessary for servicemen in view of their "special obligations of citizenship," he nevertheless lifted the ban on military participation in demonstrations, provided that the uniform was not worn; such activity took place during off-duty hours, off the military reservation, and did not constitute a breach of law and order; and no violence was reasonably likely to result.[20-62] [Footnote 20-62: Memo, SecDef for Secys of Mil Depts et al., 16 Jul 63, SD files; see also New York _Times_, July 16, 17, 20, 22, 28, and 30, 1963.] [Illustration: SECRETARY OF DEFENSE MCNAMARA.] Again an apparent liberalization of departmental racial policy actually promised very little change. First, the continuing prohibitions on participation in demonstrations were so broad and so vague that they could be interpreted to cover almost any civil rights activity. Then, too, the secretary left the interpretation of his order to the judgment of local commanders, a dubious blessing in the eyes of the civil libertarians and concerned servicemen in light of the narrow constructions commanders had given recent Defense Department memorandums. Finally, the relaxation of the ban was applicable only to the continental United States. In response to a request for guidance from the European commander, the Joint Chiefs of Staff informed all overseas commanders that as guests of Allied nations, U.S. servicemen had no right to picket, demonstrate, or otherwise participate in any act designed to "alter the policies, practices, or ac
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726   727   728   729   730   731   732   733   734   735   736   737   738   739   740  
741   742   743   744   745   746   747   748   749   750   751   752   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
servicemen
 

participation

 

demonstrations

 

rights

 
commanders
 

policy

 
activity
 

Finally

 
military
 
Defense

Concerning

 

interpreted

 

Statement

 

dubious

 

blessing

 
judgment
 
secretary
 

interpretation

 

Involvement

 
apparent

liberalization

 

departmental

 

Illustration

 

DEFENSE

 

MCNAMARA

 

racial

 

continuing

 

prohibitions

 
change
 
promised

SECRETARY

 
Allied
 

nations

 

guests

 

informed

 

overseas

 

picket

 
policies
 

practices

 
designed

demonstrate

 

participate

 

Chiefs

 
recent
 
Department
 

memorandums

 

relaxation

 

Policy

 

concerned

 

narrow