FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   464   465   466   467   468   469   470   471   472   473   474   475   476   477   478   479   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   487   488  
489   490   491   492   493   494   495   496   497   498   499   500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509   510   511   512   513   >>   >|  
that when the Under Secretary of the Navy, Dan A. Kimball, (p. 336) reported to the Personnel Policy Board in May that "Negro Marines, including Stewards, are assigned to other [white] Marine Corps units in accord with their specialty," he was speaking of rare exceptions to the general rule.[13-72] [Footnote 13-71: Memo, CMC for CG, FMF, Pacific, 11 Feb 49, with attached Handwritten Note, Div of Plans and Policies to Asst CMC, 11 Feb 49.] [Footnote 13-72: Memo, Under SecNav for Chmn, PPB, 2 May 49, PPB 291.2.] Cates seemed determined to ignore the military inefficiency attendant on such elaborate attempts to insure the continued isolation of black marines. The defense establishment, he was convinced, "could not be an agency for experimentation in civil liberty without detriment to its ability to maintain the efficiency and the high state of readiness so essential to national defense." Having thus tied military efficiency to segregation, Cates explained to the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Air that the efficiency of a unit was a command responsibility, and so long as that responsibility rested with the commander, he must be authorized to make such assignments as he deemed necessary. It followed, then, that segregation was a national, not a military, problem, and any attempt to change national policy through the armed forces was, in the commandant's words, "a dangerous path to pursue inasmuch as it affects the ability of the National Military Establishment to fulfill its mission." Integration must first be accepted as a national custom, he concluded, "before it could be adopted in the armed forces."[13-73] Nor was General Cates ambiguous on Marine Corps policy when it was questioned by civil rights leaders. Individual marines, he told the commander of a black depot company in a case involving opportunities available to reenlisting black marines, would be employed in the future as in the past "to serve the best interests of the Corps under existing circumstances."[13-74] [Footnote 13-73: Memo, CMC for Asst SecNav for Air, 17 Mar 49, sub: Proposed Directive for the Armed Forces for the Period 1 July 1949 to 1 July 1950, AO-1, MC files.] [Footnote 13-74: Idem for CO, Second Depot Co, Service Cmd
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   464   465   466   467   468   469   470   471   472   473   474   475   476   477   478   479   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   487   488  
489   490   491   492   493   494   495   496   497   498   499   500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509   510   511   512   513   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Footnote
 

national

 

efficiency

 

military

 

marines

 

SecNav

 
responsibility
 
policy
 

ability

 
Secretary

forces

 

Marine

 
defense
 

segregation

 

commander

 

adopted

 

concluded

 

custom

 
accepted
 
affects

commandant

 

change

 
attempt
 
dangerous
 

Establishment

 

fulfill

 

mission

 
Military
 

National

 

pursue


Integration

 

involving

 

Directive

 

Forces

 
Period
 

Proposed

 
existing
 

circumstances

 
Service
 

Second


interests

 

Individual

 

company

 
leaders
 

rights

 

General

 

ambiguous

 

questioned

 

problem

 
future