FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   933   934   935   936   937   938   939   940   941   942   943   944   945   946   947   948   949   950   951   952   953   954   955   956   957  
958   959   960   961   962   963   964   965   966   967   968   969   970   971   972   973   974   975   976   977   978   979   980   981   982   >>   >|  
whether we are drifting into Blaineism, or Clevelandism, or centralization, or free-trade, or extreme protection, or rule by corporations. We boast greatly of our smartness. It is time we were up and dressed to prove it. THE MYSTERY OF THE SEX There appears to be a great quantity of conceit around, especially concerning women. The statement was recently set afloat that a well-known lady had admitted that George Meredith understands women better than any writer who has preceded him. This may be true, and it may be a wily statement to again throw men off the track; at any rate it contains the old assumption of a mystery, practically insoluble, about the gentler sex. Women generally encourage this notion, and men by their gingerly treatment of it seemed to accept it. But is it well-founded, is there any more mystery about women--than about men? Is the feminine nature any more difficult to understand than the masculine nature? Have women, conscious of inferior strength, woven this notion of mystery about themselves as a defense, or have men simply idealized them for fictitious purposes? To recur to the case cited, is there any evidence that Mr. Meredith understands human nature--as exhibited in women any better than human nature--in men, or is more consistent in the production of one than of the other? Historically it would be interesting to trace the rise of this notion of woman as an enigma. The savage races do not appear to have it. A woman to the North American Indian is a simple affair, dealt with without circumlocution. In the Bible records there is not much mystery about her; there are many tributes to her noble qualities, and some pretty severe and uncomplimentary things are said about her, but there is little affectation of not understanding her. She may be a prophetess, or a consoler, or a snare, but she is no more "deceitful and desperately wicked" than anybody else. There is nothing mysterious about her first recorded performance. Eve trusted the serpent, and Adam trusted Eve. The mystery was in the serpent. There is no evidence that the ancient Egyptian woman was more difficult to comprehend than the Egyptian man. They were both doubtless wily as highly civilized people are apt to be; the "serpent of old Nile" was in them both. Is it in fact till we come to mediaeval times, and the chivalric age, that women are set up as being more incomprehensible than men? That is, less logical, more whimsical, more
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   933   934   935   936   937   938   939   940   941   942   943   944   945   946   947   948   949   950   951   952   953   954   955   956   957  
958   959   960   961   962   963   964   965   966   967   968   969   970   971   972   973   974   975   976   977   978   979   980   981   982   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

mystery

 

nature

 

notion

 

serpent

 

Meredith

 

statement

 

evidence

 

difficult

 

understands

 

Egyptian


trusted

 

simple

 

affair

 

Indian

 

American

 

circumlocution

 

records

 

mediaeval

 
interesting
 

Historically


logical

 
whimsical
 

savage

 

enigma

 

incomprehensible

 

chivalric

 

tributes

 

production

 

deceitful

 
comprehend

prophetess
 

consoler

 

ancient

 

desperately

 
mysterious
 
performance
 
wicked
 

understanding

 
qualities
 

people


recorded

 

pretty

 

civilized

 

doubtless

 

affectation

 

things

 

severe

 

highly

 

uncomplimentary

 

recently