FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26  
27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   >>   >|  
e case in due course was tried at the Maidstone Assizes, and the plaintiff obtained a verdict for 400 pounds for herself and 125 pounds for each of the children. A rule for a new trial was granted by the Divisional Court: the rule for the new trial was discharged by the Court of Appeal. The Lords reversed the decision of the Court of Appeal, and ordered a new trial. New trial took place at Guildhall, City of London, before Mr. Baron Pollock; jury again found for the plaintiff, with 700 pounds _agreed_ damages: Company thereby saving 200 pounds. Once more rule for new trial granted by Divisional Court: once more rule discharged by Court of Appeal: once more House of Lords reverse decision of Court of Appeal, and order _second new trial_. So that after more than four years of harassing litigation, this poor widow and her children are left in the same position that they were in immediately after the accident--except that they are so much the worse as being liable for an amount of costs which need not be calculated. The case was tried by competent judges and special juries; and yet, by the subtleties of the doctrine of contributory negligence, questions of such extreme nicety are raised that a third jury are required to give an opinion _upon the same state of facts_ upon which two juries have already decided in favour of the plaintiff and her children. Such is the power placed by our complicated, bewildering, and inartistic mode of procedure, in the hands of a rich Company. No one can call in question the wisdom or the learning of the House of Lords: it is above criticism, and beyond censure; but the House of Lords itself works upon the basis of our system of Procedure, and as that is neither beyond criticism nor censure, I unhesitatingly ask, _Can Old Fogeyism and Pettifoggism further go_? RICHARD HARRIS. LAMB BUILDING, TEMPLE, _October_, 1883. PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION. When Old Fogeyism is being lowered to his last resting place, Pettifoggism, being his chief mourner, will be so overwhelmed with grief that he will tumble into the same grave. How then to hasten the demise of this venerable Humbug is the question. Some are for letting him die a natural death, others for reducing him gradually by a system of slow starvation: for myself, I confess, I am for knocking him on the head at once. Until this event, so long wished for by al
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26  
27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Appeal
 

pounds

 

plaintiff

 

children

 
juries
 
Company
 

system

 
Pettifoggism
 

Fogeyism

 

Divisional


decision

 

granted

 
question
 

discharged

 
criticism
 
censure
 

RICHARD

 

HARRIS

 
procedure
 

learning


BUILDING

 

wisdom

 

unhesitatingly

 
Procedure
 

mourner

 
reducing
 

gradually

 

natural

 

Humbug

 

letting


starvation

 

wished

 
confess
 

knocking

 

venerable

 

demise

 
EDITION
 
lowered
 

October

 

PREFACE


resting

 

hasten

 

tumble

 

overwhelmed

 
TEMPLE
 

questions

 
damages
 

saving

 
agreed
 

Pollock