FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28  
29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   >>   >|  
Court of Appeal; and whether the Government proposed to take any steps to remedy the delay and increased cost occasioned to the suitors by the present administration of the Judicature Acts. The Attorney-General said the number of cases of all descriptions then waiting for trial in the Chancery Division was 848, and in the Court of Appeal 270. The House would be aware that a committee of Judges had been engaged for some time in framing rules in the hope of getting rid of some of the delay that now existed in the hearing of cases; and until those rules were prepared, which would be shortly, the Government were not desirous of interfering with a matter over which the Judges had jurisdiction. The Government were now considering the introduction of a short Judicature Act for the purpose of lessening the delay.--_Morning Post_. [No rules or short Judicature Act at present!] {0a} On the 13th April, 1883, Mr. Glasse, Q.C., thus referred to a statement made by Mr. Justice Pearson of the Chancery Division: "The citizens of this great country, of which your Lordship is one of the representatives, will look at the statement you have made with respectful amazement." The statement appears to have been, that his Lordship had intended to continue the business of the Court in exactly the same way in which it had been conducted by Mr. Justice Fry; but he had been informed that he would have to take the interlocutory business of Mr. Justice Kay's Court whilst his Lordship _was on Circuit_; and, as it was requisite that he should take his own interlocutory business _before the causes set down for hearing_, "ALL THE CAUSES IN THE TWO COURTS MUST GO TO THE WALL"!!! His Lordship added, that it would be necessary for him to rise at 3 o'clock every day (not at 3 o'clock in the _morning_, gentle reader), because he understood he should have to conduct the business of Mr. Justice Kay's Chambers as well as his own.--_Morning Post_. On the 16th April, 1883, Mr. Justice Day, in charging the Grand Jury at the Manchester Spring Assizes, expressed his disagreement with the opinion of the other Judges in favour of the Commission being so altered that the Judge would have to "_deliver all the prisoners detained in gaol_," and regarded it as "a waste of the Judge's time that he should have to try a case in which a woman was indicted for _stealing a shawl worth_ 3_s._ 9_d._; or a prisoner charged with stealing _two mutton pies_ and _two ounces of
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28  
29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Justice

 

business

 

Lordship

 

statement

 
Judges
 

Government

 

Judicature

 

interlocutory

 

Appeal

 

Morning


hearing

 

stealing

 

present

 
Chancery
 
Division
 
COURTS
 

Circuit

 

morning

 

CAUSES

 

requisite


Spring

 

regarded

 

detained

 
altered
 

deliver

 

prisoners

 
indicted
 
charged
 

mutton

 
ounces

prisoner
 

charging

 
Chambers
 

conduct

 
reader
 

understood

 

opinion

 
favour
 

Commission

 

disagreement


expressed

 
Manchester
 

Assizes

 

gentle

 
country
 

engaged

 

framing

 

committee

 
desirous
 

interfering