FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   525   526   527   528   529   530   531   532   533   534   535   536   537   538   539   540   541   542   543   544   545   546   547   548   549  
550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574   >>   >|  
_____________________ QUESTION 58 OF JUSTICE (In Twelve Articles) We must now consider justice. Under this head there are twelve points of inquiry: (1) What is justice? (2) Whether justice is always towards another? (3) Whether it is a virtue? (4) Whether it is in the will as its subject? (5) Whether it is a general virtue? (6) Whether, as a general virtue, it is essentially the same as every virtue? (7) Whether there is a particular justice? (8) Whether particular justice has a matter of its own? (9) Whether it is about passions, or about operations only? (10) Whether the mean of justice is the real mean? (11) Whether the act of justice is to render to everyone his own? (12) Whether justice is the chief of the moral virtues? _______________________ FIRST ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 58, Art. 1] Whether Justice Is Fittingly Defined As Being the Perpetual and Constant Will to Render to Each One His Right? Objection 1: It would seem that lawyers have unfittingly defined justice as being "the perpetual and constant will to render to each one his right" [*Digest. i, 1; De Just. et Jure 10]. For, according to the Philosopher (Ethic. v, 1), justice is a habit which makes a man "capable of doing what is just, and of being just in action and in intention." Now "will" denotes a power, or also an act. Therefore justice is unfittingly defined as being a will. Obj. 2: Further, rectitude of the will is not the will; else if the will were its own rectitude, it would follow that no will is unrighteous. Yet, according to Anselm (De Veritate xii), justice is rectitude. Therefore justice is not the will. Obj. 3: Further, no will is perpetual save God's. If therefore justice is a perpetual will, in God alone will there be justice. Obj. 4: Further, whatever is perpetual is constant, since it is unchangeable. Therefore it is needless in defining justice, to say that it is both "perpetual" and "constant." Obj. 5: Further, it belongs to the sovereign to give each one his right. Therefore, if justice gives each one his right, it follows that it is in none but the sovereign: which is absurd. Obj. 6: Further, Augustine says (De Moribus Eccl. xv) that "justice is love serving God alone." Therefore it does not render to each one his right. _I answer that,_ The aforesaid definition of justice is fitting if understood aright. For since every virtue is a habit that is the principle of a good act, a virt
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   525   526   527   528   529   530   531   532   533   534   535   536   537   538   539   540   541   542   543   544   545   546   547   548   549  
550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

justice

 

Whether

 
perpetual
 

Therefore

 

virtue

 
Further
 

constant

 

rectitude

 
render
 

sovereign


unfittingly

 

general

 

defined

 

follow

 
unrighteous
 

intention

 

denotes

 

capable

 

action

 

unchangeable


serving

 

Moribus

 

answer

 

principle

 

aright

 

understood

 

aforesaid

 

definition

 

fitting

 
Augustine

absurd

 

Veritate

 

needless

 
defining
 
belongs
 
Anselm
 

essentially

 

subject

 
operations
 

passions


matter

 
inquiry
 
Twelve
 
Articles
 

JUSTICE

 

QUESTION

 
twelve
 

points

 

Objection

 

lawyers