FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   534   535   536   537   538   539   540   541   542   543   544   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558  
559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   >>   >|  
general _virtually;_ thus a universal cause is general in relation to all its effects, the sun, for instance, in relation to all bodies that are illumined, or transmuted by its power; and in this sense there is no need for that which is "general" to be essentially the same as those things in relation to which it is general, since cause and effect are not essentially the same. Now it is in the latter sense that, according to what has been said (A. 5), legal justice is said to be a general virtue, in as much, to wit, as it directs the acts of the other virtues to its own end, and this is to move all the other virtues by its command; for just as charity may be called a general virtue in so far as it directs the acts of all the virtues to the Divine good, so too is legal justice, in so far as it directs the acts of all the virtues to the common good. Accordingly, just as charity which regards the Divine good as its proper object, is a special virtue in respect of its essence, so too legal justice is a special virtue in respect of its essence, in so far as it regards the common good as its proper object. And thus it is in the sovereign principally and by way of a mastercraft, while it is secondarily and administratively in his subjects. However the name of legal justice can be given to every virtue, in so far as every virtue is directed to the common good by the aforesaid legal justice, which though special essentially is nevertheless virtually general. Speaking in this way, legal justice is essentially the same as all virtue, but differs therefrom logically: and it is in this sense that the Philosopher speaks. Wherefore the Replies to the First and Second Objections are manifest. Reply Obj. 3: This argument again takes legal justice for the virtue commanded by legal justice. Reply Obj. 4: Every virtue strictly speaking directs its act to that virtue's proper end: that it should happen to be directed to a further end either always or sometimes, does not belong to that virtue considered strictly, for it needs some higher virtue to direct it to that end. Consequently there must be one supreme virtue essentially distinct from every other virtue, which directs all the virtues to the common good; and this virtue is legal justice. _______________________ SEVENTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 58, Art. 7] Whether There Is a Particular Besides a General Justice? Objection 1: It would seem that there is not a particular besides a
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   534   535   536   537   538   539   540   541   542   543   544   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558  
559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

virtue

 

justice

 
general
 

essentially

 

directs

 
virtues
 

common

 

relation

 
proper
 

special


object

 

respect

 

Divine

 

charity

 
strictly
 

directed

 

essence

 

virtually

 

argument

 

considered


belong

 

manifest

 

Objections

 

commanded

 

speaking

 

happen

 

distinct

 

General

 

Justice

 
Besides

Particular

 

Objection

 

Whether

 
supreme
 
Consequently
 
higher
 

direct

 

Second

 
ARTICLE
 

SEVENTH


command

 
effect
 
instance
 
bodies
 

effects

 

universal

 
illumined
 

transmuted

 

things

 

called